Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[tinman]

@tinman
You seem to be confusing even the most basic terms and concepts and I would recommend going to the website below and reading all the explanations.
http://amasci.com/miscon/whatis.html
It is by far the best site I have ever seen concerning common sense explanations that anyone can understand.
AC

OK-this is bullshit.
What creates the power coming from a battery-thats right,chemical energy.
So when i say is the energy equal stored within the gas and disipated as heat to that of the energy going into the cell-then thats exactly what i mean.--->>>energy in to energy out.
The primary energy is chemical. The secondary state is electrical power in.

Why dose it always have to be so hard-it's like working for the linch mob here.

You know what-im done

Enjoy

Oh to be so bloody perfect AC.

[verpies]

...look at the picture below,and answer this very simple question.
Account for all the energies out,...

So you put some electric energy in and get the following out:
1) Chemical bond energy
2) Buoyancy of the gas bubbles due to phase change.
3) Heat energy (or cooling) depending whether the electrolysis is performed in the exothermic or endothermic region (see diagram below).

[MarkE]

Cool-so what about PM's-->where is there electrical charge?

You mean where is the moving charge?  And the conventional answer is it is the electron spin.  It is NOT the electron charge.

Could it be those negatively and positively charges i was talking about some time back?,that have a close association to that of static charges-

Absolutely not, see above.

Quote: The electrostatic force is what causes opposite charges to attract, and like charges to repel. Electrons, negatively charged, tend to stick to protons, positively charged. Two protons would repel each other, as would two electrons.

They forgot to add that positively and negatively charges are also attracted to neutral charges.

No they do not.  Neutrons do not electrostatically attract protons or electrons.

[MarkE]

@MarkLet's be perfectly clear, first you cannot know everyone/no one so that is a lie, thus you cannot know that "no one has ever offered reliable evidence of it" which is also a lie and the conservation of energy does not negate free energy which is a false belief.

So you have reliable evidence of free energy do you?  Or you can locate reliable evidence of free energy can you?

I mean your arguments are simply ridiculous because logically I can tear them apart without even trying. Come on Mark you can do better than that because your last post was pre-school in my opinion.
AC

Evidence, where is your evidence?

[ramset]

Mark E
hello ,I hope your having a nice day today
  I ask you a question and this is just based on the
contributions here in this thread,  which in my opinion [and others] are _either_ examples of
suppression ,or milking the cash Cow alah "hopegirl" but in this case with OUR tax dollars which unlike Hopegirls voluntary donations we pay for this cash cow or else face prison sentence.

  Here AC shared a very promising simple solar tech which pffers stupefying potential
in the year 2002....
13 years and this simple game changing  tech is where??


http://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-full-spectrum-solar-cell.html

why don't you find out for us Mark E ,I'm tired of carrying water for you only to have you kick the pail over and laugh.

call them and ask why our tax dollars are going to these "hopegirl" public projects ??
that we were told would be very simple and to expect shortly...
or maybe MH can call and report back ??

IS THERE  A CRIME BEING PERPETRATED  , FRAUD,  SCAM  ??

suppression ??
other issues??
13 years ...come on,    you boys are our champions 

do us some real good .....
respectfully
Chet
PS
and you often ask me why my sentences are chopped up or all over the place
seems your computer does not suffer the same afflictions as mine on these pages.

must be nice...