Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sum of torque

Started by EOW, October 12, 2014, 05:36:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

dieter

Hi EOW,


did I understand this correctly:
the motor turns the big pulley, the small pulley recovers the energy, and the support rotates due to inertia?


Did you get the gears yet?


BR

EOW

Quotethe motor turns the big pulley, the small pulley recovers the energy, and the support rotates due to inertia?
yes, there is no torque on the support IF pulleys don't accelerate.

QuoteDid you get the gears yet?
yes but the energy recover is lower (there is friction and efficiency of generator is not 1 maybe 0.8 or lower) beause w is small and the motor turn very quickly => the force is small, I need a low speed motor and a support that turn at w high enough. I gave an example, the power recover is smal with a small force.

dieter

There may be some low RPM dc motors using built in gears, like eg. a grill motor. I also got one from the mentioned laserprinter, although more of a motor with attached gear set. However defective laserprinters are a great source for gears, I got mine for 5 bucks, was even still working, but I wasn't interested in printing...


Other sources may be Microwave oven plate motor (dc?) or scanner motor, they all need to be low RPM for what they do.


BR


EOW

QuoteThere may be some low RPM dc motors using built in gears
with gears inside, there is a counterclockwise torque on the support, the motor needs to rotates slowly or the angular velocity of the support must be high.

With:

w (support) = 157 rd/s (1500RPM)
w (motor) = 157*2rd/s and P=300 W, the torque is 1.91 Nm => the force is 19 N if 3R = 0.1 m, R=0.1/3

The generator turns at 6w but the stator of the generator turns at w, so the difference is 5w. The generator can give 5FRwt.

The power won is 2FRw = 200 W

If the efficiency of the motor and the generator is 0.8, the global efficiency is 5/3*0.8*0.8 = 1.06 so it is necessary to use brushless motor (some can have an effciency of 0.9) and without take in account of the efficiency of the electronic card and the belt... maybe 0.95 for the belt and for the electronic card, the global efficiency become 5/3*0.8*0.8*0.95*0.95=0.96. With a motor/generator at 0.9 this could be: 1.21

Maybe the best is to test a basic dc motor/generator and look the efficiency without rotation of the support and turn more and more the support and look at the efficiency, the efficiency must increase more and more like the angular velocity of the support. The small pulley can be smaller, 3R for the bigger and 0.2R for the smaller, the efficiency will be at 29/15*0.8*0.8*0.95*0.95=1.11

dieter

There are also losses in getting the required current to the pulley's motor. As the support is rotating, you maybe need to use brushes. Or you could try inductive coupling if the support has near zero mechanical losses: an additional disc on the support's shaft, maybe 1-2 foot away to prevent magnetic interferences with the dc motor etc. Although the Lorentz force is the only cost in frictionless inductive coupling (other than friction etc.), the implementation would complicate things.


Furthermore, you also got to extract the power from the generator to measure it ...


If the COP is over 1.0 then it may be possible to have everything on the support...


BR