Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[tinman]

It would seem i can find no end to the amount of turns on a coil that can be had without it effecting the pull force on the magnet-as per my setup shown in previous video's on this thread.

I started with a former with 500 turns of .31mm wire.The P/in was 24 volts @ 620mA. The pull force as measured by my setup was 55 gram's. I added another 500 turns,and the pull force remained at 55 gram's,while the P/in dropped by half. Then i added another 500 turns,and another,and have at present 2500 turns on the coil former. My P/in now is 24 volts @ 109mA,and the pull force still remains at 55 gram's. This is without the second coil on the other side of the magnet,which as we have seen will halve the P/in again,without effecting the pull force on the magnet.

My question is this-->how far can this be taken?-how many turns can be placed apon each former before we see a reduction in pull force?. Is this an infinite situation where the applied force apon the magnet that can be turned into mechanical rotational force that exceeds the P/in requirement?.

Have we been  looking at this all wrong,in that we try to keep resistive losses low,when infact i am seeing no change what so ever in raising the resistance by 500%. If i can get the resistance to 5k ohms,then at 24 volts we would only consume 4.8 milliamps,which would be only 115mW-for 55 grams of pull force. This is a far cry from the 14.8 watts we started with.

Dose any one know the limit here?

[TinselKoala]

As you know, the field from an electromagnet depends on "amp-turns". With any real wire, the more wire you use the greater the resistance and the less current will flow for a given supply voltage. Over a certain range, the relationship is linear or nearly so; that is, you can add turns, which add resistance, but the field remains the same because as turn number goes up, current goes down and the field remains the same. However you will eventually reach a point with smaller wire or lots of turns where the relationship is no longer linear and it will require more voltage in your supply to overcome the resistance of the added turns and keep the current from "falling off the cliff" and becoming too small to sustain the field at the required strength.
In your experiments you just haven't hit that range yet.

[synchro1]

@Tinman,


Joseph Newman has reached the limit you speak of. I attached a picture of his three ton electric motor below:


@Milehigh,


The magnet core output coil Conradelectro tested needed to be SHORTED to achieve the "Lenz Propulsion" effect I forecasted. You impudently prevented Conradelectro from testing the coil with a capacitive load as I instructed him to, causing me great embarrassment, and failed test results. Doug Konzen clearly demonstrated the same effect in this video:


Quote from Doug's Youtube description:

"This video is meant to show that with coils short-circuited, and also with a stack of magnets behind the cores of the generator coils, you can get the motor to speed up".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaaEdGPO7C8&list=UUQ6H_iTqiOiZHbdU-Rjf_eg&index=1


Connecting a capacitive load between the coil leads, contrasted to strong resistors, amounts to the same difference dead shorting would have compared to an open circuit. 

Another point you're confused about;

The power of the N pole facing monopole magnet rotor derives from the superior strength of the south pole of the electro magnet solenoid coil.

"Experiment: In our experiment we used a bar magnet, ruler, and paper clips. We used a ruler to measure the distance of the force exerted from each pole by pulling paper clips. Three attempts were measured. In the first and second attempt the South Pole started attracting the paper clips at 1 inch and in the third attempt it attracted paperclips at inch. In the first and second attempt the North Pole attracted paper clips at inch and in the third attempt it attracted paper clips at inch. Conclusion: Based on our experiment we concluded that the South Pole had a greater magnetic force than the North Pole".

Lastly, the Tesla series bifilar coil is not a D.C. coil!

[MileHigh]

Synchro1:

You have been on this site several times today, Sunday November 16.  You have certainly read my response to your foolish posting, yet no comment from you?  You read how TinMan confirmed my interpretation of his test results and he went one step further and made better tests confirming the results again.  That's where you called my comments "malarky" and you called me a fraud.  Are you implying that you are so stupid that you don't even understand error tolerances?

No response from you?   No apology from you?  You are a spineless coward, and apparently the only thing that you can do now is run away.  I have seen this ridiculous and immature behaviour from you in the past.

Today marks the day where your stupid asinine behaviour comes to an end.  Grow the f*ck up and act like a man.

MileHigh

[shylo]

To TK &Tinnman, I was testing this today power consumption can be reduced .
If you use both sides of the electro-magnet.
I added resistance to a single coil but got no response or atleast not noticeable.
Releasing a permanet magnet from an e-mag creates a spike ,you can catch it.
Good stuff, Thanks.
artv