Crystal Cell Research for Experimenter

[plengo]

Since the pattern of decay is basically flat, it might be more useful to look at one reading per day over weeks or months to get
a real feel for what's going on... looking at a day or 2 with a flat reading doesn't tell us much more than "it ran flat for a day or
2" - I would love to know how it's done over weeks, months, years.... even start date and now readings (just 2) would give
a real feel for how the decay rate is moving along.

For example: If a cell runs under load constantly for 2 weeks and starts at 1100 mA under load and ends up at 800 mV after 2 weeks,
it may look like a flat line in 12 hours, but with just those 2 reading and the number of days (14), we can calculate a daily decay
rate, which is what I think is important over weeks, months and years... in this case, the average decay rate is 1100 mV start
minus 800 mV current = 400 mV total decay, divided by 14 days equals 28.57 mV decay per day.

I know Bedini told everyone to get one of those programs and use it to monitor crystal batteries with it, but imagine having one
for every battery. You would have to have a computer for each battery. It doesn't make sense, UNLESS the load test is just for a
day or 2 or less... am I wrong here? Just my opinion....

That's why I am posting the COMPLETE reading since it started (or was activated). One can do what you are proposing but simply choosing the FIRST voltage (or voltage shown on the meter at the picture time) and average it. This cell once was activated started at 2.581 volts and around 2 mA delivery over that Green 10 mm LED. Today is 2.585??!!!! So far she is winning big time. Let's see in months.


Unfortunately if I leave her for months on the ONLY meter I have, I am in trouble. 

[plengo]

Looking at those pictures, I still can't determine the total decay rate over the hand-typed 18.5 days. Can you hand type the start and
end voltage so we can determine the daily decay rate? It looks like almost NONE, but I am still not sure.... Thanks Fausto!!!

PS - Awesome Cells... the best I have seen...

That's correct, no decay based on the numbers but the opposite, a gain of around 0.005 volts.


Fausto.

[tgraca]

That's correct, no decay based on the numbers but the opposite, a gain of around 0.05 volts.
Fausto.

I am not sure what the cost of the initial charge is, and although we could calculate joules used in the initial charge, and at 60+ volts,
it may come to over a month of running these cells, if some free energy generation mechanism was used, it wouldn't matter...
much...

I looked at your work with something like the Telsa Switch and it looked very promising, but very different from what Patrick Kelly has
documented. I have also seen people work with electrets using just capacitors. Here's Beardon's description of an electret.

http://www.cheniere.org/references/electret.htm

It looks promising, but the few experiments I have tried with this and the Tesla Switch have failed miserably. I use solar panels. Sure
they cost money, but if you calculate the joules produced over a 30 year period and the current cost of electricity, it is a bargain...
and yes... I have a lot of experience as a systems analyst, so I have analysed these costs extensively with solar and that is an easy way
to cheap electricity and free electricity at certain points in a 30 year plan.

Anyway... I am almost ready to build 4 more cells and do the Fausto Sizzle using 2 of my low powered solar panels, which will give
over 30 V and about 800 mA.... I anticipate 20 seconds just to go with what you have said recently. What do you think? Give them
a quick zap?

[Heavens Pavement]

Here is a update of my f149 3 cells under a 5mm white LED load from epsom solution add tip now, interesting graph to me, i probably made this wrong, but thats ok Im going to let this go til it goes 0 or buffer runs out.


My Alum cell given the F30v sizzle is still going but definitly dimmer. that even got thumbs up from family members .

[plengo]

Here is the kind and size of cell I have been trying to do to replicate my successful cell #149 (the one in the graphs) that only takes 20 seconds zapping.


Fausto.