GDS 3 KW generator runs on water

[MarkE]

The Pelton wheel in the GDS unit is nothing but a prop.  The lead acid batteries and the DC-AC inverter are what produce the output electricity.

[Nink]

Mark E
am I to assume this thread represents your opinion of Critical review?
@NInk
I am sorry to read your contributions here represent your quality of scientific rigor.


Job applications and cut and paste investigations .


Did you just Pile on and not read the thread? did you not read the part where we have an opportunity /invitation
to perform scientific measurements of this device?? If so please explain how ANY of your contributions to this thread are of any value other than to Inflame an already volatile and at best tenuous  situation?


Nink, have you ever in your life performed or contributed to such a test
in any way whatsoever??

thx
Chet

Hi Chet,
I have worked in research for many years and have over 100 patents. I review other peoples inventions for a living.  I do not believe a single  closed box test in the presence of the inventor provides the necessary rigor for an unbiased and objective review process. 

To perform a successful review it is imperative that you have full unrestricted access to the invention. All schematics, diagrams and any other relevant disclosure information should be provided prior to the review process. This is necessary to adequately formulate a review plan and decide on the appropriate test criteria and conditions that will be required in order to perform your analyses. You will need to identify and engage the appropriate subject matter experts based on the preliminary information provided. 

It is also absolutely mandatory that the  inventor is not present during the review process and if possible the review occurs in a location that is decided by the review team and not the inventor to ensure there is no possibility of bias.   

If you honestly believe a single, closed box review in the presence of the inventor at the inventors chosen location will result in unbiased and accurate data for analyses of the invention will allow you to provide an informed opinion on the legitimacy of the invention,  I can assure you that you are sadly mistaken. 

As I stated I am open to understanding if the invention is legitimate and I am just focusing on facts and data that is publicly available on the internet.  A position to hire people and grow a call center is a good example of someone making a legitimate effort to grow a business so I believe this was a relevant post. 

[ramset]

Mark E
If I could just state one fact which negates every single point you are making.
have you noticed in this thread that there is an invitation to scientifically measure this GDS unit?


can you state in plain english why you are not recognizing or acknowledging this very simple fact
and continually referring to completely irrelevant History that will in NO WAY reflect on this test or its outcome?


Please??
or are we going to do research on all the generator suppliers in Korea next and how their chassis seem to have come from similar vendors??


More irrelevant Photo shop garbage
More marketing mumbo jumbo from perhaps Mr.Potters childhood
or maybe a past life?


please start your own threads on this and leave this one to folks here that wish to help with this theme in a sane  and focused manner.


Please
Thx
Chet
Ps
Nink
so you are posting drinking birds here,  why?
making Jokes about my thread  Why?


as has been stated this is not a solicitation for investors at some Patent fest
this is not a closed Box test .
Black box applies to the MO of the device and its working principle


PERIOD


For such a smart man you are exceptional here in only your rude behavior and sophomoric antics.
please start another thread .
PPS
here is an example of YOUR level of scrutiny
"I review other peoples inventions for a living"
= come show me your inventions so I can sell them or patent them after you leave my office.


similar garbage being thrown around here about Mr.Potter


Prejudice with out investigation...
quite rude
No??

[MarkE]

Mark E
If I could just state one fact which negates every single point you are making.
have you noticed in this thread that there is an invitation to scientifically measure this GDS unit?

I am aware that Potter has told you that under some unspecified conditions that he will allow you to perform unspecified tests at some unidentified facility supposedly sometime after December 15.  This is despite that he claims to have 10 units now, and has been advertising units since January on his Mexico web site.

can you state in plain english why you are not recognizing or acknowledging this very simple fact
and continually referring to completely irrelevant History that will in NO WAY reflect on this test or its outcome?

Promises of future deliverables are just promises.  Potter's and GDS's history is entirely relevant as is the plain simple fact that water is not fuel, as is the same fact that Potter has demonstrated a battery packaged in a box with an inverter.

Please??
or are we going to do research on all the generator suppliers in Korea next and how their chassis seem to have come from similar vendors??

Chet, I have already stated that I don't have a problem with anyone gutting OTS goods to build prototypes.  I do object when people such as Potter / GDS present Photo Shopped images of someone else's equipment as their own gear.

More irrelevant Photo shop garbage
More marketing mumbo jumbo from perhaps Mr.Potters childhood
or maybe a past life?

Chet if you don't think it is relevant that Mr. Potter represented an image he edited as a picture of real product, then to me it looks like you are trying to bury your head deep in the sand.

please start your own threads on this and leave this one to folks here that wish to help with this theme in a sane  and focused manner.


Please
Thx
Chet

Chet do you believe the thread is best served by getting down to facts, or promoting preconceived fantasies?  If it is the former then you should welcome all discussion of the facts, whether or not you agree with anyone else's conclusions.  If it is the latter, I have no respect for that.  May I point out your OP?

Offline ramset

    Hero Member
    *****
    Posts: 4479

GDS 3 KW generator runs on water
« on: October 26, 2014, 02:24:26 AM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEqSuTOKUEg


all info and comments welcome


thx
Chet

Have you changed your mind about welcoming comments and information?

Ps
Nink
so you are posting drinking birds here,  why?
making Jokes about my thread  Why?


as has been stated this is not a solicitation for investors at some Patent fest
this is not a closed Box test .
Black box applies to the MO of the device and its working principle


PERIOD


For such a smart man you are exceptional here in only your rude behavior and sophomoric antics.
please start another thread .
PPS
here is an example of YOUR level of scrutiny
"I review other peoples inventions for a living"
= come show me your inventions so I can sell them or patent them after you leave my office.


similar garbage being thrown around here about Mr.Potter


Prejudice with out investigation...
quite rude
No??

[ramset]

Mark
so you [resident Expert] have no interest in the testing discussion at this time..
your primary interest is a shadow boxing,  single party fraud investigation of an old advertising
campaign by  Mr.Potter ?


and Yes I am no longer interested in anything but the recent Test agreement which supersedes and
negates any other concerns by Default .


To reiterate,  of what value is historic single party advertisement analysis to an ongoing Proof of advertised claims Test protocol?


this Test will clear up all concerns
ONE WAY OR THE OTHER...............


END OF STORY!!


all other concerns will be MOOT.


thx
Chet