Lenz free generator + a different pulse motor!

[dieter]

Basicly the theory is the same with Thane Heins: Offer the CEMF an easier path. In theory the current in the 2nd coil, if it consists the CEMF, should be reversed compared to the first coil. In theory the path trough the second coil should become less attractive when under load, resulting in reduced RPM. Which didn't happen which is contradicting.  However, deflecting the CEMF to a separate core loop will prevent the Lenz effect, no need for a second coil if this works. Although, a Gap may be required to prevent the primary flux to skip the first coil and use 'the easy path" instead.

[BorisKrabow]

Hi All ! Well, if there named Thane Heins and love gaps  ....  surprise !
           Thane Heins + Gap = Valeri Ivanov  ( Bulgaria ) .  600 percent efficiency ! ! 
   http://www.inkomp-delta.com/   ,   http://www.youtube.com/user/Waleri1021/videos  .

[life is illusion]

Hi All ! Well, if there named Thane Heins and love gaps  ....  surprise !
           Thane Heins + Gap = Valeri Ivanov  ( Bulgaria ) .  600 percent efficiency ! ! 
   http://www.inkomp-delta.com/   ,   http://www.youtube.com/user/Waleri1021/videos  .

Boris, I really liked this design. Thanks a lot for sharing it. Pasiba 600% is truly amazing achievement! Now I just feel like putting a shunt next to the secondary of the generator. I think I should change my name and call myself "the shunt man" or even "gaped shunt man"

@ dieter, I totally agree my friend, I think the second coil is not needed, but if it doesn't interfere with the primary nor with the rotating disk of magnets, then it is more than welcome to join our party

Best Regards
Sam