Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

The SeaMonkey believes that readers

...should be provided with the most misleading and poor quality information.

Wisdom is arrived at gradually through the assimilation of information offered by numerous resources.

Yawn.  Sorry but this is clearly the opposite of what you believe.  If this was the truth then the expectation would be for you to produce hart-to-find articles that are both for and against an issue.  Ones with particularly interesting points of view.

Instead you are a monotone of anti-medical nonsense. You produce articles that are not hard-to-find and do not approach an issue in a novel way.  For the most part they are old and have been refuted many times over.

The SeaMonkey brings to the attention of interested readers information which is not readily available within the Main
Stream Media.

Apparently SeaMonkey is living in 1995 where the Internet is not mainstream and is spelled with a capital 'I'.

TRUTH is the objective.

Nope.  You have provided nothing useful for determining the truth.  Simply a fountain of poorly explained and (mostly) catastrophically ignorant opinion.  Teaching people about critical thinking, reason and math.  In fact not one thing you have posted attempts to teach a GENERAL problem solving skill.  Hence you are clearly the opposite of what you purport to be.

[SeaMonkey]

You are of course free to have a differing opinion and
to express that opinion as you choose.  That is the
beauty of such a forum as this one.

Your opinions are always informative and revealing;
particularly to those who are adept at such interpretation.

Carry on.

[sarkeizen]

You are of course free to have a differing opinion

Well it's a good thing we have you here to grant people the right to have opinions.   I mean if that's the way you really feel.

Again if you are actually interested in the truth.  Then show, clearly and unambiguously one specific piece of information which helps people differentiate between a true thing and an untrue thing.

[SeaMonkey]

...
Again if you are actually interested in the truth.  Then show, clearly and unambiguously one specific piece of information which helps people differentiate between a true thing and an untrue thing.

There was a time not too long ago when such
skill was demonstrated in the home, in public
institutions and in the public schools.

At a time several decades ago when the campaign
of mass disinformation and deception was yet in
its early stages of development.  Since the advent
of mass mind control as practiced today in radio,
television, hollywood, periodicals, publications and
government it may be that most people are unfamiliar
with the skill.

But we do seem to have an inherent desire to find TRUTH
hard-wired into our being.  Exposing ourselves to information
which runs contrary to the 'official story line' may be all that
is needed to re-discover that dormant skill.

In any case, TRUTH is on the way.  It shall make its appearance
world-wide in the not too distant future.

[sarkeizen]

In other words, by your own admission.  You have contributed nothing to determining the truth.

I appreciate you coming clean about this.  Now go somewhere else and pretend you know something over there.

(If you disagree the challenge is still open.  Quote one thing you have stated which clearly and unambiguously helps people determine truth from untruth.)