Vaccinations; recent developments

[Cap-Z-ro]

So wait.  Did I lie? or am I supporting someone who's lying?  If I'm allegedly supporting someone who's lying why won't you say who or where or how you know?

Why wouldn't you provide me the opportunity to correct myself?  Or yourself.  After all it's possible that you are utterly wrong.  Right? Or did you become infallible at some point?

Another great quote:

" Don't know what?  That vaccines are very safe?  Evidence strongly suggests that they are."



Lets call a Mulligan on the evidence the so called CDC "scientists" hid, which showed their "very safe" vaccines were causing autism.

I believe that hiding evidence wood qualify as a lie of commission.

And, it naturally follows that those who supports this lie...

Regards...

[Cap-Z-ro]

.

[Madeo]

I was under the impression that the Overunity forum was a collection of open minded individuals who are interested in alternative energy and alternative health discussions. It is quite surprising that there are people here who strongly defends the use of mercury in human bodies especially babies. I simply cannot fathom why ANY levels of mercury is safe which one of the most potent neurotoxin.  On who's standards?  FDA, Pharma companies, AMA, other gov't agencies?  I think we all understand that these groups are corrupt. They are not interested in your health. They are interested in money. There is a lot of money in managing diseases, but hardly any for curing it. The sicker you are, the more money they can suck out of you and your family.   So why should I trust their statistics, rigged research, and opinions ?





Here are simple questions:


What is the safe level of mercury in the body ?
What is the safe level of lead in the body?
what is the safe level of plastic chemicals in the body?
what is the safe level of monosodium glutamate in the body?
what is the safe level of tobacco chemicals in the body?
What is the safe level of alcohol in the body?
What is the safe level of preservatives in the food that I cannot even pronounce?


One simple answer :  ZERO.  If it was safe, then the body would have produced it or has receptors specifically for them in the first place.

[allcanadian]

@Sark

Dude you said that you could go into a drug store and BUY a flu vaccine.  However you can't - just about anywhere in Canada.  Now you seem to be backpedaling and trying to claim that when you said "walk into a store and buy" you meant "paid taxes".  So you seem like you are lying about living in Canada.

Well where I live in Southern Alberta, Canada just about every drug store has a sign that basically states-- flu shot available here...as in here... this place...the place you are now looking at. Now what do you suppose that means?. I could be idiotic or otherwise predisposed but the fact that my wife is an registered nurse and in fact she says yes you can get a flu shot for $30 plus change would have me believe you are not quite with us. Which does not surprise me because many are not quite with us in the here and now...as in right now and here, vice vera.


Maybe this may remind you--
http://www1.shoppersdrugmart.ca/en/health-and-pharmacy/health/this-year-get-your-flu-shot-at-shoppers-drug-mart/40717/2?lang=en%3FCategory%3DHealth


http://www.rexall.ca/services/flu-shot


http://www.walmart.ca/en/flu-shot-clinics


Uhm which part of this do you not understand?, Where exactly are you from?, I mean which planet and the precise location if you will?. Which part of anytime, any day, no appointment necessary do you you not understand?.


Which part of--
For protection and convenience, you can get your flu shot at more than 280 Walmart Pharmacy locations across Canada. We can help you find the nearest Walmart Pharmacy flu shot clinic locations and hours of operation--

--Do you not understand?,  or do you have mental issue we should need to be concerned about?. I mean...Dude... if your going to spout BS then at least try to make it believable in some remotely credible way because this is just embarrassing. I don't really want to do this anymore than you do so let's try to keep it within the realm of this planet...earth if we could.


As i said this was not happening in the last few years to my knowledge, this is new and quite disturbing that there are literally no checks and balances in this process. Why we may as well have a cattle shute and just run the stupid bastards through that which would be much more cost effective.


AC

[sarkeizen]

Lets call a Mulligan on the evidence the so called CDC "scientists" hid, which showed their "very safe" vaccines were causing autism.

Wrong.  There is no actual data which shows what you're talking about.   What you're indirectly referencing (indirectly - because you have never actually read this study) was Hooker's reanalysis of DeStefano et al.  Hooker is not a epidemiologist or a bio-statistician he's a biochemist.   Which is why he botched the analysis so badly.  He used Pearson's chi-squared test to determine a positive correlation between age/ethnicity groups and autism.     The problem is that doesn't account for confounders and is more likely to give false positive on small samples.  Which is exactly what he was working with.  When you use a logistic regression - which is what you should use in that case and is what DeStefano used - the correlation disappears.

I believe that hiding evidence wood qualify as a lie of commission.

So who's lying again?  It's not the numbers.  They say no correlation.   So if Thompson is disagreeing with the research doesn't that make him at least confused if not actually lying.

And, it naturally follows that those who supports this lie...

So you support Thompson and the implication is that Thompson is wrong (according to the data).  Doesn't that make you supporting someone who's at least confused if not lying?

Interesting fact if you believe that Hooker's analysis is correct.  You realize that you absolutely have to believe that the MMR is completely and totally safe for everyone else.  Otherwise you're just cherry picking your data. Which is kind of like lying - just to yourself but as you are the easiest person to fool...