Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

Truth cannot be refuted although the Deceiver will certainly try.

So, in other words you didn't even try to refute any of the information you post here.  Right?  You didn't put even the most casual amount of effort into that.  Right?  Because otherwise that would, in your eyes make you the Deceiver.  Am I with you so far?

Of course that means you couldn't have thought critically about anything you've posted at all.  I think you can see that based on how much you are avoiding the issue.   So when you call something a "must see".  Does that phrase actually mean anything?  If it does it implies that you have evaluated the evidence - if you had evaluated the evidence then there would have been a chance for it to be found wanting.   However since only the Deceiver evaluates evidence the words "must see" can't convey any sense of value.

Making you something of a deceiver...thanks for admitting that.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Guess I'm right.  You really have run out of steam on the whole CDC whistleblower issue.  Your backing out of an argument you started doesn't win you any originality awards either.  Just sayin...

"A lie, if repeated will be accepted as truth,"


Quote from a psychopathic dimwitt

But the people eventually did catch on...and they tried to eliminate them.

And to this day the carnage continues...trolls are employed to facilitate an increase in the death rate.

But, alas they are losing the battle for minds, as more and more people have stopped listening and started looking at events from both sides, instead of the one sided mainstream propaganda packaged version.

Regards...


Regards...

[Cap-Z-ro]

Just to show that I do provide proof to support my assertions, here is where I find a lot of good insider intelligence...

govttrollswholiketosmelltheirownfarts.com

Regards...

[sarkeizen]

And to this day the carnage continues...trolls are employed to facilitate an increase in the death rate.

So again, I'd just like some clarification here.  You really think.  Completely and without reservation.  That I am actually getting real money for posting with you.  Someone who seems to believe in three conspiracy theories before breakfast.  Who thinks if you removed every chemical from your body you would be better off.   Someone who doesn't know the definition of the word "chemical".

Do you really think you have a high level of credibility.  I mean to the average person.  Do you think that if you just polled a few folk in the checkout line and asked them if they thought people who talked about "chemtrails" were a little crazy.  Do you think they would all say "no way, that's one of the most pressing issues today". 

Which of course leads to a problem with your whole "sarkeizen gets paid to make Capt-z-ro look more stupid than he usually does" idea.  Even to someone who's business is propaganda there's very little value in (further) discrediting you. 

[Cap-Z-ro]

Someone who doesn't know the definition of the word "chemical".

...your whole "sarkeizen gets paid to make Capt-z-ro look more stupid than he usually does" idea. 

*Cap schools frustrated troll below*

The word 'chemical' has at least 2 catagories...

1. Chemicals naturally produced in the body.
2. Chemicals which are man made.

Regards...