Vaccinations; recent developments

[SeaMonkey]

Oh, the humanity...to be called a troll by a paid shill.

*is crest fallen*

Regards...

'Tis naught more than classic diversion.  The
'perps' nearly always accuse their 'targets' of
being what they positively are.

This too shall pass.

Their addiction for intercourse is extreme.

[Cap-Z-ro]

'Tis naught more than classic diversion.  The
'perps' nearly always accuse their 'targets' of
being what they positively are.

This too shall pass.

Their addiction for intercourse is extreme.

The challenges are many multiples of three,

when you are paid by the stroke of key.

Regards...

[sarkeizen]

what they positively are.

I have a theory about people who use words like '100%' or 'positively' in a context where you can't really be sure.  I tend to think that people like this are actually revealing their insecurity in their position and are compensating by "papering over" their doubts with extreme terms.   What do you think?

[SeaMonkey]

I have a theory about people who use words like '100%' or 'positively' in a context where you can't really be sure.  I tend to think that people like this are actually revealing their insecurity in their position and are compensating by "papering over" their doubts with extreme terms.   What do you think?

If the shoe fits, wear it.

A tree is known by the fruit it bears.

Failure is a detour, not a dead-end street.

And:

[Pirate88179]

I was responding to sarkeizen and you decided to respond to me while quoting my responses to sarkeizen! What more proof do you need that you abused forum etiquette?

Now you are trying to tell me that you have a right to respond to others when they are not even talking to you.

I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you. Lol

But I guess you have been on the internet for so long that you already forgot what etiquette means?

I'm 100% sure you would not like it if someone else answers for you and this can be proven 100% so I don't really know what you are arguing about unless you have an over inflated head that you seem to believe that you are "untouchable"!

You are kidding...right?  I mean, you come on a public forum, and want to hold a private conversation...is that it?

There is a device called a p.m. (private message) built into this software that allows for that.

You claimed that 99% of all people on all forums agree with your new rule.  I would sure like to see the study that proves that correct.  Everyone on this forum, and all of the others I have been on for years, act like they are all together in a room speaking.  Have you never been to a cocktail party?

If you are at a cocktail party, and want to have a private conversation, you go outside, or into another room. (PM)

Surely you can not be this ignorant can you?

Also, what the hell does  "I can picture you having a conversation with someone in real person and then someone else cuts you off and speaks for you" mean?
I am not going to abide by this new rule that you just made up.  I doubt that anyone else here will do so either.

Try the p.m.

Bill