Vaccinations; recent developments

[Tink]

It's simple.  Either you understand what evidence supports your position or you don't.  If you do, then why do I have to watch a video?  If you don't why would I care about what you believe?  If you are right - about something - it would only be by accident.

... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

For others: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2XKRanrz28

[SeaMonkey]

Average video imparts information at 145 WPM.  So I could read five video scripts in the time that I could watch one.  I could probably do medline lookups on at least two or three in the same time and probably skim the published work on at least one.  So yes watching a person make claims about something is vastly inferior to having a reasonable understanding of the topic.  Which is why videos are a waste of time.

If you can tell me a few points which are really strong arguments.  Then I'd be happy to respond.  Otherwise I'd suspect that rather than see something interesting I'd hear an argument that isn't very good or realize that you're not very smart.

Sark-ezzzz's feeble attempt above to justify his
fear of considering any 'input' which could possibly
destroy his AGENDA-driven caricature is just that:
Lame.


What are you afraid of Sar-kezzzzzz?  Afraid that some
little bit of TRUTH might penetrate your carefully
guarded barriers and cause you to begin thinking
critically?

Your non-time-wasting EGO is beginning to show its
supremacist face and proclivities.

Unsurprising.  Evidence was profusely extant which proved
(established) it was in there.

[sarkeizen]

For others: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2XKRanrz28

The offer is, as ever open.  Put forth a strong argument (preferably the strongest most compelling argument) from one of these videos here and I'll be happy to respond.  Otherwise don't waste peoples time.

What are you afraid of Sar-kezzzzzz?  Afraid that some little bit of TRUTH might penetrate your carefully guarded barriers and cause you to begin thinking critically?

If that were true.  Then why would I invite and encourage people to provide the strongest bits of evidence from those very same videos right here?  Is your claim that I'm somehow afraid of *weak* evidence? LOL.

I guess I really got your goat about your Wakefield post.   It's your own fault for  mentioning actual studies.  Stick to broad generalizations and baseless assertions - that's where your strengths are.

[Pirate88179]

94.7% of all people that died last year used Ketchup some time in their lives.  We need to ban Ketchup now to stop these senseless deaths.

This is exactly the false association that some people make that Sark is trying to point out here.  Those folks probably also used mustard, rode a bus at least once, drank water (Oh my God) had relations with a lover, (Have to ban that) laughed...etc...etc.

I appreciate his wanting to discuss REAL and PROVEN facts and studies.  Some folks do have an agenda...the anti-Ketchup folks certainly do and would use the above numbers to advance their movement.

Bill

[orbut 3000]

Well, there IS an agenda. You just have to connect the dots.
Example:
1. Biking causes impotency (see Daily Mail)
2. Agenda 21 promotes bike lanes.
Conclusion: Agenda 21 (U.N.) wants to kill you.