Vaccinations; recent developments

[Magluvin]

a) HopeGirl/fixtheworld has her own thread here exposing how much of a scammer she is.  You should post this there.
b) Probably because you simply uncritically swallow anything that appears to agree with you.  You might not have realized that this article - in the loosest sense of the term - calls THIS FORUM a scam deliberately set up by the government trolls.  Perhaps you want to level that accusation at the site administrator?  Hmmm?  Please say yes.  Moron.
c) Virtually all the links and videos are grounded in a few lines from a document that none of you have even seen.  I'm certainly not saying that Snowden is a fake but documents have context and considering you've never even read a few paragraphs of this one.  Don't you think it's a little premature to be trumpeting how the government as special ops people sitting around here talking to nobodies likes you?

"Don't you think it's a little premature to be trumpeting how the government as special ops people sitting around here talking to nobodies likes you?"

English please. 


Mags

[Tink]

Attack of the triples? (are you three brothers? does Stephan know about this?)
Your posts on O.U. or not O.U. coils is very much appreciated but this subject is not about O.U. but about vaccine dangers and you all "three" seem to be willing to bring forth government propaganda and I very much doubt your good intentions and smell an agenda.

[SeaMonkey]

Vaccine Opponents Do Have Scientific Backing

Here is a list of medical journal abstracts on vaccine hazards. 
They prove that science is not on the side of vaccines, and anyone pushing vaccines is an Illuminati stooge.

[MarkE]

Attack of the triples? (are you three brothers? does Stephan know about this?)
Your posts on O.U. or not O.U. coils is very much appreciated but this subject is not about O.U. but about vaccine dangers and you all "three" seem to be willing to bring forth government propaganda and I very much doubt your good intentions and smell an agenda.

Does this mean that you are not going to answer the questions I posed?  You have made a series of assertions.  My questions are directed at probing as to whether those assertions have any logical foundation in fact.  If all you can do is blow smoke, that's fine.  I have a fan.

We can always try again:

What criteria do you use to determine whether something is dangerous or not?  According to that criteria:  Which vaccines are dangerous?  What objective evidence have you used to determine that each of the vaccines you declare are dangerous meet your criteria? 

Remember, you are the one who just declared he/she hates dishonesty.  Let's see you offer an honest answer to each question.

[Pirate88179]

Attack of the triples? (are you three brothers? does Stephan know about this?)
Your posts on O.U. or not O.U. coils is very much appreciated but this subject is not about O.U. but about vaccine dangers and you all "three" seem to be willing to bring forth government propaganda and I very much doubt your good intentions and smell an agenda.

It is not gov. propaganda.  Just look at the REAL numbers.  Of course, you need to know a little about statistics but...it should be self-explanatory.
Sure, there have been some reactions to this vaccine.  There always is a certain percentage of folks that have a bad reaction to anything.  BUT, you need to compare this small number to the numbers of deaths from measles to be able to make any kind of intelligent choice.

When a big plane goes down, 250 are killed.  Sounds dangerous right?  Overall, we all know the numbers that prove that flying is much safer than driving.  So, if flying were banned in an effort to "save lives", many, many thousands more folks would be killed driving.  Looking at the REAL numbers of reactions to vaccines and the deaths they prevent is a no brainer.

Crunch the numbers yourself if you are able to do so...then make an intelligent choice.  You need reliable input to be able to do this however.
SeaMonkey's links are not what I would deem reliable.


Bill