Vaccinations; recent developments

[SeaMonkey]

One of those strange 'hiccups' where a posting was duplicated.

[MarkE]

How the BMJ and Brian Deer Fixed the Record to Destroy Andrew Wakefield Part 2

http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/03/how-the-bmj-and-brian-deer-fixed-the-record-to-destroy-andrew-wakefield-part-2.html




Mags

The discgraced fraud Andrew Wakefield destroyed himself.

[orbut 3000]

Once in a while when SeaMonkey links to some fantastical story on some web site I have never heard of I click on the home link just to see what the front page of the web site looks like.  Very often it is some crazy whackadoo brain-eating web site for basement hovel conspiracy theorists on meds.

The ads on those webshites are even more confidence inspiring:

[SeaMonkey]

It seems that Big Pharma, Big Medicine, Big Vaccine
and all of their 'supporters' are transitioning into
High Desperation Mode:

Fabricated Clinical Tests

As promised, The Apocalypse exposes all lies
and reveals all Truths.

[sarkeizen]

Yeah yeah, slap slap.

Not sure what you're doing behind that keyboard...but I'm pretty sure I don't want to know.

If you have to rely on me to coerce you

Either you have a position you can talk about or you can't.  You don't.  You're not even the tiniest bit interested in anything that might contrast with the positions you've posted.

I'm completely interested in having my opinion changed but no matter how many times I've asked for strong evidence for your opinions you can't seem to give me any.  It seems pretty obvious that it doesn't take much energy to type: "This is strong evidence" and then paste whatever it is you are currently reading or a url to a specific time-index in a video.  Since you are not willing to expend even the smallest most pathetic amount of energy to support what appears to be your position.  Then I'm already bored.

then what a pitty for the rest of the 43,00 plus readers

Are you expecting fractional readers?  Are you 0,01 of a reader?

when it comes to you proving your position

To whom?   Pretty much all the posters like yourself are either trolls or have zero intellectual integrity.  So who exactly would I be convincing?  Clearly not you.  I mean you and SeaMonkey are so disinterested in your OWN position you won't even read your own links.

If you think that just putting me down validates your side of the argument for the readers

I doubt there are many readers and all I'm really doing is pointing out that none of you believe in your own evidence enough to stand up and tell me where the strong parts are.  I think that kicks you in the teeth more than rebutting every line from every website who's head would probably be more useful if it was scooped out and used as a planter rather than posting about vaccines.

slap all you want

Dude, if you are slapping anything.  I really don't want to know.

Man, you would make a terrible teacher.

To someone who can neither articulate the strengths of their position or discuss it like yourself?  Sure, I'm absolutely lousy at teaching people who can only vomit up links.