Lenz free generator

[web000x]

What I am saying is the motor coil is at the same time a generator coil.  There is only one shaft, and this case only one coil which is simultaneously motoring and generating an electrical output.  Assuming one wants to do things the right way, a coil which simultaneously motors and generates is the only way forward.

Regards

Does the simultaneous generating/motoring effect that you've observed happen to have anything to do with the space angle of the rotor?  In other words, due to the inductive reactance of the coil windings, the MMF lags the actual space position (TDC, etc) of the magnets in the rotor.  If the speed of the rotor and inductive reactance of the coils high enough, theoretically the rotor could find itself positioned closer to the next pole piece in rotation while the coil on the last pole projection is still building up current due to XL.  If the next pole piece has a polarity opposite of the previous pole, the rotor would be sucked FORWARD in and ADDITIVE manor, accelerating the rotor while also generating.


Thanks


Dave

[lancaIV]

Thank you,Erfinder, #729 (not 728; Sorry me !) ,this answer correlated the opinion about your first answer ,our correspondence related !


THz:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=DD&NR=287597A5&KC=A5&FT=D&ND=3&date=19910228&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP


internal cited :  DD286012 Elektronengas-Kreislauf  Plasma-Cycle/circuit
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2014/12/04/compact-fluorescent-fusion/
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/184899/difference-between-fusion-plasma-and-fluorescent-lamp-plasmas


But now is really enough
                                      B"I"-B"I"
                                                    OCWL


p.s.:        I am here, the world is of no interest to me.
                Mourinho: Special One
                Klopp:       Normal One
                Erfinder                  One,more or less 

[web000x]

No. 




I could demonstrate the exact same thing in a machine designed to be driven at TDC, and with that being said, I regret to say again...no.




Do you see where your thinking is?  It is totally entangled in the maze of the inductive reactive.  Consider what it would take to transition a predominantly inductive reactive system, into a predominantly capacitive reactive system.  The character of your apparatus must change from dominant XL or opposition to change in flux or current to dominant XC or opposition to change in voltage.


Regards

Its not totally entangled in inductive reactance.  I spoke with Eric Dollard long enough to realize the importance of its conjugate XC in all electrical systems..  My mind was there because of how Jim Murray described some of this phenomena in one of his presentations.


So this added capacitance.  In your devices, is it derived from multifilar coil configurations?  Or is it a lumped capacitance placed outside of the coil somewhere?


Thanks


Dave

[lancaIV]

                             an old/eld motor/notor technique (2D)
http://media3.news.ch/news/fb/296740-396c983d4290901e4060ffe25e7c0eb3.jpg


                            3/4D and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolamite


                          converting to an industrial mass-produceable device

                 http://csnetwork.eu/livingmachines/conf2015/%5BLM2016%5D

                            ( photo/phono-synthese "engine" farming )


                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanism

[web000x]

You think a conversation with one with knowledge on the subject will give the necessary insight for engineering that which is said to be impossible?  Especially when said individual has no interest in the direction of research that occupies the minds of all who would shower him with senseless questions if they were given the opportunity. 

Lol, no not really.  But it did give me what I feel is a pretty good BS sniffer and some good direction to follow.  I will find that for which I am looking, in time.


Dave