Lenz free generator

[tinman]

You cannot and will not lead anyone to anything practical, let alone useful.

And you can?
Jim !tha man! Murray's dynaflux generator perhaps?

P/in=556.34 watts
P/out to load=40.09 watts
Efficiency=7.2% 

He da man 

As i said,you insult others and there work,and yet you present the worst generator ever made as being the path to the future.


Brad

[tinman]

I just say what others won't about yours and the resident plagiarist, copy paste junkie.

Your work is and will forever remain an abomination,

And still smoke anything you have ever done.

and you are one to talk, all you do is insult "others" work, hypocrite.

Such as who?--Murray,Bedini,Arron the rookie?--the garbage you promote ?.

You stated that Murray would run rings around me,so where are the rings?

Now,that dynaflux generator you love so much,from the man you admire so much--now that is an abomination 

In fact Erfinder,after all these years of your fairy dust engineering,you have not presented one device from any of your guru's,that is even close to being anywhere near as efficient as the RT,and that is a fact. You dislike me because you know i see through the bullshit-such as Jim !tha man! Murray's dynaflux generator. I bet you didnt even bother taking any notice at all at what the efficiency actually was,but more so just followed a blind path behind !tha man! that said he had a winner. Now you try and drag others into your trip up the garden path,and you dont give a rats ass who you tread on while on your journey to no where.

Quote post 230

The ignore function works, just wanted to share that in case anyone felt the need to use it, I just added two individuals.  Felt good.....

Even your ignore function efficiency is well below standards.
Hopefully there are those that did not place me on !ignore!,and look at the data i supplied on Jim !the man! Murray's dynaflux generator,and can now see just how inefficient it actually is--and this is the type of garbage you are telling people here that they should pay attention to--while calling my RT and L.A.G an abomination lol.

Then came the !beat frequency! saga-->because Jim !tha man! said so   


Brad

[i_ron]

author=i_ron link=topic=15307.msg490912#msg490912 date=1472856669]

Hi Ron

It's not about taking side's.
The existence of this forum is built on searching for truth's,and weeding out the rubbish from the roses. It is about presenting fact's,and removing fictions,and we do a good job most of the time-->but some times the weeds just keep coming back.
snip
I will give you an example of fact and fiction--Jim Murray's dynaflux generator.

Brad

Thanks Brad, well thought out experiment, I had missed that but see the connection now to the "dynaflux".


I am working on a Bob Teal rep at the moment, having foolishly sent $7 US to the "army", that was funny!


Ron

[allcanadian]

@Erfinder

The relation of the added beats is such that it causes the isolated envelope to transition from a standing to traveling wave.  Now you have a wave packet which bounces between impedances, a less than ideal set of circumstances (a situation which demands one's attention prior to trying to apply this for practical use) for the packet of energy you have worked hard at isolating and mobilizing.

While I do not believe two oscillators producing a beat frequency can show a gain I do think it has the potential to do some interesting things. Things which we cannot do any other way due to the nature of the process.


For instance if we have two oscillators producing a standing wave function and a third element within the standing wave dissipates a given amount of energy periodically then the energy transfer is towards the standing wave center. The two oscillators lose energy and the third element gains the energy lost from the two oscillators which it dissipates and energy is conserved.


Energy is conserved, however if the two oscillators are driven by the loss in energy in the system acting inward towards a third element which reinforces the standing wave this is considered work. The third element which gained energy from the system and dissipated it in another form also causing an inward acting force is also considered work. Therefore it may be possible to perform two work functions while still conserving energy under the correct conditions. It would be similar to removing a section of the standing wave and having the standing wave rush in to fill the void so long as section removed ceases to exist in it's original form.


Of course this is simply speculation and it raises many questions concerning the nature of energy as it relates to the work performed within a system. Can a loss of energy produce a gain in work just as a gain in energy produces a gain in work?. If it can then there may be the possibility of two work functions.


AC

[tinman]

Thanks Brad, well thought out experiment, I had missed that but see the connection now to the "dynaflux".


I am working on a Bob Teal rep at the moment, having foolishly sent $7 US to the "army", that was funny!


Ron

Indeed Ron lol.

Bob Teals motor operation description .

The Magnipulsion Engine produced large amounts of mechanical energy while running on short pulses of DC current delivered to its electro-magnetic coils. In addition, when the power coils were turned off, the circuitry could also recapture most of this input electricity from the collapsing magnetic fields to be used again.

Now how dose Bedini's SSG work again?  --,which by the way ,was actually designed and patented by Roger Andrews in 1974,and is not Bedini's work at all.

When you spend the time weeding through all the garbage,and doing some research,you begin to see who is on the money,and who is full of crap.

Below is a picture of one of Bob's early motors,and a picture of an !advanced! Bedini pulse motor.

Really makes you wonder some time's how these people get away with this sort of thing.
Seems advanced Bedini is only 44 years behind 

Brad