Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ZERO INPUT, 10 degrees thermal output...Yes,...genuine free energy

Started by TheoriaApophasis, December 22, 2014, 05:54:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

I believe mr moray was fooling around with bismuth too mmmmm

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 30, 2014, 02:32:21 AM


I NEVER AND AT NO TIME mention the MAGNET being hotter ....... rather the bismuth.


likewise it was shot in TOTAL darkness, and also covered with non-reflective black cloth, ........so your reflective premise is a red herring and bull shat.

The discussion was with regard to your earlier claim that a magnet emits heat...

CANGAS

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 30, 2014, 02:30:23 AM

the book is free, "uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism"  on archive.org  etc etc.


also another 300+ pages to add to the book.


lux et veritas


Well, I was hoping for a briefer kind of a summed-up answer, to compare your thinking with that of Faraday, without taking a year sabbatical to figure out the complexities of YOUR strange and wonderful, and, hyper-complicated, hypothesis of moving magnetic field provided by a "stationary" magnet.

OK, folks, move on. Nothing to see here, go and use up a year of your short life to puzzle over a long answer that could have, if it is true, could have been answered concisely within one minute.

Many years ago today, Faraday voted "NOT!". For about two hundred years NOT! has been working pretty good. NOT! is very simple to understand and marvelously quickly explained, and, understood.

Your hypothetical YES!, if true, could be equally easily and quickly explained. You have not done so. That leads me to think that your are hiding something. 


thanks et answeritas anywayus
CANGAS 115

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: CANGAS on December 31, 2014, 01:18:24 AM
YOUR strange and wonderful, and, hyper-complicated, hypothesis of moving magnetic field provided by a "stationary" magnet.


anyone who thinks a magnetic field is not moving, is INSANE.     Gyromagnetic precession and phase differential between poles of rarefaction and compression CANNOT BE DENIED by anyone.


The Larmor frequency is a WELL KNOWN ENTITY, 
  in case you didnt think (most people never DO), frequency necessitates MOVEMENT by definition,  ......simple enough for you?



There is nothing complicated about it, the fault lay at YOUR feet, not mine,..........  the blind complain about not seeing a pretty flower.



The absolute truth, as it happens, magnetism is NOT a field in definition, once finally reduced, rather a force of the loss of dielectric inertia

Magnetism is  a FORCE, not a field, all spatially divergent Ether modalities are the loss of counterspatial inertia, expressed either as magnetism, or spatial condensates as matter, or as transverse expressions of electricity. There is only ONE FIELD, dielectricity, the rest are field modalities with divergent expressions.



and no, Im not contradicting myself, however as a CONTRIVANCE, speaking about "magnetic fields" is acceptable for DISCUSSION, .......but the brass tacks are that MAGNETISM IS NOT A FIELD

TheoriaApophasis

I posted quote 1 some time ago, and MOST 'speculation' here (and elsewhere) was that people assumed Tesla was talking about his AC motor / invention rather than the discovery of reciprocating / rotating force/magnetic field divergences and convergences.


Quote number #2 as found in another location entirely,.........by any reckoning seems to dispel the notion that Tesla placed or MEANT to imply his huge pride was invested in his AC MOTOR invention/ discovery RATHER THAN the discovery of reciprocating magnetic field divergences-convergences.


AS SUCH Tesla's greatest pride (if you will) seems to stem from his grasp of the fundamental nature of magnetism itself RATHER THAN his AC motor invention which harvested this force and power.




QUOTE 1
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:

Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, the world wireless system, It was not the induction motor; instead it was the discovery of the principle that preceded the induction motor, the "rotating magnetic field". Tesla answered: "rotating magnetic fields were dear to my heart. When I made the discovery of the rotating magnetic field, I was a very young man. The revelation came after years of concentrated thought and it was my first great thrill. It was not only a valuable discovery capable of extensive practical applications. It was a REVELATION OF NEW FORCES AND NEW PHENOMENA unknown to science before".
"No", Dr. Tesla said with some feelings, "I would not give my rotating magnetic field discovery for a thousand inventions, however valuable, designed merely as mechanical contraptions to deceive the eye and ear!"
Then saying: "A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come." - Nikola Tesla
Article: "A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future" (Popular Science Monthly)



QUOTE 2 (parenthesis mine)


"No amount of praise is too much to bestow upon Edison for his (lamp / bulb), but all he did was wrought ('work') in known and passing forms. What I contributed constitutes a new and lasting edition to human knowledge. Like his lamp, my induction motor may be discarded and forgotten in the continuous evolution of the (electric motor?) arts, but my rotating field with its marvelous phenomena and manifestations of force (from magnetism) will last as long as science itself" - Nikola Tesla
New York World Nov. 29, 1929, p. 10 col. 4-5. To the Editor of the World





If you dont understand what Tesla is SAYING in quote 2, then I would say you were a goddamn idiot.


POINT BEING, Teslas pride is NOT HIS AC MOTOR, but the discovery of rotating (reciprocating) magnetic 'fields' (divergence)


~~~~~~

In another ilk, I love this one I found.

"Seldom if ever has an original ideal of consequence been born in an elaborate laboratory. The egg of science is laid in the nest of solitude. True, it maybe later be incubated, hatched and nursed in a million dollar laboratory. No big laboratory is needed in which to think. Originality thrives in seclusion free of outside influences beating upon us to cripple the creative mind. Be alone! This is the secret of invention; be alone, that is where ideas are borne." – Nikola Tesla