ENERGY AMPLIFICATION... REVEALED!

[TinselKoala]

Batteries are not rated in Horsepower! One horsepower is a bit under 750 Watts. Any car battery can produce much more than that power easily. Automotive batteries are rated in energy capacity (Amp-hours) and in "cold cranking amps" and it is not unusual for a car battery to have 500 or more CCAs, which would be 12Vx500A= 6 kW or about 8 horsepower! And that's the bottom end of the CCA range necessary for reliable starting in cold weather! A new modern battery will have 750 CCA or more! And power is not energy, anyway!

So at any rate it looks to me like your testing may not have really exceeded the energy capacity of the batteries when all is put together. Sure, it's possible to transfer charge from, say, two batteries in series into one battery, and thus overcharge it to the point of outgassing -- and you were wise to reduce power at that point. But in every case that I have ever seen properly tested, like in Bedini systems or other battery-switching systems, the _average charge_ on all the batteries taken over time is always decreasing and always eventually runs out. I'd be happy to see some real data that proves otherwise, though. So it's too bad that your testing wasn't scientific... experimentation without actual data recording isn't very useful because it can mislead you into thinking things that aren't exactly true.

[Dave Wing]

This is a simple test to show energy can be reused multiple times, with minimal losses if any. Run the test for at least 10 minutes for each section, with a stop watch.  At the end you run for 50 minutes but how much energy have you actually lost in the system?

-Dave Wing

[a.king21]

Batteries are not rated in Horsepower! One horsepower is a bit under 750 Watts. Any car battery can produce much more than that power easily. Automotive batteries are rated in energy capacity (Amp-hours) and in "cold cranking amps" and it is not unusual for a car battery to have 500 or more CCAs, which would be 12Vx500A= 6 kW or about 8 horsepower! And that's the bottom end of the CCA range necessary for reliable starting in cold weather! A new modern battery will have 750 CCA or more! And power is not energy, anyway!

So at any rate it looks to me like your testing may not have really exceeded the energy capacity of the batteries when all is put together. Sure, it's possible to transfer charge from, say, two batteries in series into one battery, and thus overcharge it to the point of outgassing -- and you were wise to reduce power at that point. But in every case that I have ever seen properly tested, like in Bedini systems or other battery-switching systems, the _average charge_ on all the batteries taken over time is always decreasing and always eventually runs out. I'd be happy to see some real data that proves otherwise, though. So it's too bad that your testing wasn't scientific... experimentation without actual data recording isn't very useful because it can mislead you into thinking things that aren't exactly true.

I am not semantic pedantic.
The car batteries were approximately 750 watts.


I suggest that in the interests of fair play you familiarise yourself with late 19th century, and early 20th century electrical engineering terms.
Then you critically appraise the following GRANTED patents:


http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf
Especially the attachment, which seems harder to find online these days.

[that_prophet]

YESSSS,,,,,,
I fully agree with amplifacation
as in, ELECTRICITY MULTIPICATION

Please view all the info that I have picked up @ http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/

He gave me these two other Gifts also @
http://ultimatejoysticks.yolasite.com/
(an awesome next generation joystick = measures movement in all three axis's + measures rotations in all three axis's = that's 6 movements = 3 times basic joystick) -

AND http://ultimatevideogamecontrols.yolasite.com/
(which is awesome 3D virtual reality room = video on all 4 walls + ceiling + floor + you are held in the centre by cables to each corner. you are standing non a mat of bearings so you can walk or run in place, while graphics move around you )

These are all free for all to use, as they are displayed on the web + are without patents
We should use these to earn plenty of income to help spread the Gospel.
http://fire-starter.yolasite.com/


Before http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/ occurs,
Door closes on Christ return http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/

Now first off let's loose this fairytale of EVil-sOLUTION
God proves it wrong with His Creation Hourglass = MOON=
it only has 6000 years (very small amount) worth of sand on it,,,,,,
http://decimationofthisevolutionfairytale.yolasite.com/

FREE ENERGY
The only reason that this has not been used earlier to create free energy, are the billions of fallen angels, trying desperately make sure that we never discover this technology

I happen to be struggling with an electronic simulator at the moment,
trying to get a working model of this awesome free energy machine that God Shared
I believe that He wishes for this to be priority for me,
it is so simple, and easy to build,
could I ask for help getting a working model of this device out to the world,

http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

evil forces have put up barriers for me at every turn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
THIS WORKS, IT IS SO SIMPLE THAT IT HAS TO WORK

this device generates AC electricity by using mechanics of varying pulley sizes
to multiply rotations, 
generated additional AC electricity by using multiple generators

Free Energy made simple = electricity multiplier using 100cm to 1cm pulleys

Don't believe in God or good + evil forces
Free Energy is so simple,,, that it MUST be hidden by evil forces.

It is simplicity at its best; you simple put the minimal power into a DC motor with a 100cm pulley connected to it, which only has to rotate the once. This large pulley is connected to a belt, strap, rope or even string in a pinch, which is also connected to another small one cm pulley, which rotates 100 times. So you put in the DC power to rotate your input motor only the once, and you get out of this system 100 cycles of AC power. You have just created your first free energy machine, that multiplied your electricity by 50 or 100. If anybody starts complaining about torque being a problem, just think about how smoothly bearings are nowadays, as well as how easily electric motors rotate. You could add ten of these small pulleys, without gaining any sufficient torque, giving you a 1000 power electricity multiplier.

A drawing and better description of how this works is at:
http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

Please believe me + not all of the evil spirits
That are continuously saying, "this won't work"

Free energy is super simple
It has been staring us right in the face
Ever since we discovered how to make AC electricity

How is AC electricity made?
It is simply made by rotating wheels or pulleys
With these wheels connected to an AC motor
Which is easily created, by using a few coils of wires
And rotating them within the field of two opposing magnets

They will try to say what about torque
Torque is not a problem in the slightest,
As electric motors are the easiest to rotate
They have some of the smoothest running bearings

So you could add tens, maybe even hundreds
Of these AC motors, attached to mini pulleys of one cm circumference
On the same belt that you have a DC motor attached to as a drive motor
With a large 100 cm circumference pulley or even larger
So you only have to input enough electricity to rotate the drive motor one rotation
Then you get 100 cycles of AC electricity out of this system
For every mini pulley with an AC motor attached that you connect to the belt

[TinselKoala]

What you are doing is called "SPAMMING". You have posted multiple copies of the same UNWORKABLE scheme in six threads. What do you hope to accomplish by this? Do you even realize what you are doing?

And you really should stop claiming that you have a working model of this system, because you don't, and your wheelchair batteries will run down.