Showcase of The Unity Generator : +200% OverUnity and climbing!

[dieter]

Actually, I like the underground manufacturing idea.


And he's right, there are many Qmogen success reports. I wonder if it's simply the rubber belt that lags the torque to a period with no lorentz force and therefor allows the drive force to slip trough without being affected by lenz.


It sucks that the naysayers and system servants are yelling with the loudest voice around here.


Sure we want more evidence. But that's no reason to insult somebody, by BAD mouthing and such.


BR

[Majestic81]

I am being trolling here : called a liar, a fraud and that our intentions are not real. [in my books that is bad mouthing]
So I am allowed to speak my mind and defend myself.

That other people play tricks on others is not my business or shouldn't be the reason to immediately call someone a fraud until proven otherwise.
I don't personally treat people like that, I hope you don't in real life.

I am just here to bring some news about our progress and update the opensource community on this forum of our presence for who didn't know us or the concept of underground manufacturing before.

I didn't expect the immediate attacks & enormous demands put on any news share.

To politely answer some of the questions
1.There is no battery in the whole setup.
2.The video explains every wire and every component
3.The transcript explains every component and measurement made in the video.
4.I've explained multiple times that independent lab testing is coming, even with that I doubt some people will believe.
5.We use direct coupling, no rubber belt.

If genuinely interested please follow our progress on the available links.
Thank you all for you time and if offended by the discovery share, life goes on.

[Void]

Hi Majestic81. Just ignore the people who are being rude or insulting, as they certainly don't have
any valid reason for behaving that way.

Your device looks interesting. If you really are getting more power out than in,
it would be good if you can loop the output back to the input to make the device self run.
This won't help convince anyone who has already made up their mind, but it can help demonstrate
to more reasonable people that you do not just have measurement errors. For example,
when you measure AC voltage and current with a digital meter, it does not take into account phase shift
between the voltage and current waveforms. If you just multiply the measured RMS current times the measured
RMS voltage, it does not take any existing phase difference between current and voltage into account, so power
calculations could be off quite a bit. Loads that contain electric motors could actually be introducing
a fair bit of phase shift between the load current and load voltage, so you must use the cosine of
this phase angle (power factor) in the power consumption calculations. Have you been doing this? I did not
see any mention of this in your video or notes. Looping the output power back to the input to make the device
self running would eliminate all such potential measurement errors.

All the best...

[PIH123]

I am being trolling here : called a liar, a fraud and that our intentions are not real. [in my books that is bad mouthing]

And yet you took the 'insulted' stance in only your 5th post here (your first 3 were to spam your product about among different threads).


For the most part however, you are being either

a) invited to participate in testing (ramset and tk - replies 3 and 1 on the Free Energy Party thread)
or
b) asked legitimate questions such as ;

Stefan (this sites owner)  in the Youtube comments asked
How do you measure the input amps at your power supply ?
...  I would say something is wrong with your input measurements, as your power supply seems to have a very low efficiency in converting the AC to the about 50 Watts DC the drive motor is using... Hmm... Maybe your meters show wrong datas.


TK above is asking why you cannot self loop something with a 3500 percent COP.
And by the way, what is the evidence for 3500 % ?
You did after all put 200% in the thread title, and  then claim 3500% in the body.
This seems inconsistent and perfectly worthy of a question.

Care to answer just that last simple one please.
Was it a typo ?

No need for a huff just yet.

[dieter]

It is really more the mood in the sceptizism in postings like TKs or PIHs. Very unfriendly, arrogant one may say.


"If you don't serve me OU on a silver plate then fck off" and then, each time when some of you were more or less able to proof that someone was wrong and there is no OU in his device, you yell HORRAY, NO OU!!! and open a bottle of champagne. Of course, if somebody would actually present undebunkable proof for OU, your little world would collapse entirely.


What exactly was the reason why Witts demonstration of self looping his ecklinish generator was, as you, TK, said "obscure" (if I recall correctly)?


Mayejestic, ignore them. You may use the ignore list, over profile settings.


Keep us updated, cheers dude.