Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 73 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 07, 2015, 02:16:25 PM
@Vortex1: I don't think he's getting such a big spike anyway, since he's underdriving the transistor. Hard to tell from his scopeshot though. In my testbed when I use similar drive levels to his (from comparing scope trace appearance) the main spike only goes to 500 volts or so, when the 10R (actually 11R for me) load is connected as in the EMJ-Meyer diagram.
If you really want to kill the spike just put a modest capacitor between the cathode of the catch diode and the emitter (0V node) of the switching transistor.

T-1000

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 07, 2015, 01:01:44 PM
Here's another example of a proper Caduceus coil. Unfortunately there's no demonstration in the video, just the nice coil is shown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmJg1Kmbgk4

Could one describe these coils as "self-bucking"?

Demonstration wanted? Here is famous part of Lithuanian experiment... :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0R4Pinl5rE

synchro1

@TinselKoala,

"If you use MOSFETs, you don't need the current sharing resistors at all, they can just be parallelled 'out of the box'. MOSFETs have negative feedback 'built in': if one MOSFETs gets a larger share of the current, it gets hotter which in turn increases its resistance and reduces the amount of current going through it. This is why MOSFETs are usually preferred for applications where multiple transistors in parallel are required. However, BJTs are easier to built into current sources as they have fairly constant current gain".

John.K1

Hi guys, Some help needed here :)

EM state the best result he gets when he has the primary as an LC tank?  I have made a time ago a circuit ( ref. Mr Kopecky)  , which suppose to sustain the resonance.  I am not very good in electronics, Can somebody experienced here to take a look at it as I am not sure if it is working right for me. It heats one Mosfet more than the other and also I want to ask- is it necessary to use -12V on the comparator? Would it work with just GND instead (that's what I use at the moment) The cuircuit picture below.

Next - If the device creates or double the E field, for some reason I must think about E-Stress capacitor(or device), I have made two sized versions and non of them worked - maybe it would with a bit different configuration of winding as we discuss here?

Also I am translating the document of Mr Brovin- It is around 13 pages- pain in an ars- but it is quite interesting and also related to the principles we talk here about?

Regards   

TinselKoala

Quote from: synchro1 on February 07, 2015, 02:39:04 PM
@TinselKoala,

"If you use MOSFETs, you don't need the current sharing resistors at all, they can just be parallelled 'out of the box'. MOSFETs have negative feedback 'built in': if one MOSFETs gets a larger share of the current, it gets hotter which in turn increases its resistance and reduces the amount of current going through it. This is why MOSFETs are usually preferred for applications where multiple transistors in parallel are required. However, BJTs are easier to built into current sources as they have fairly constant current gain".

A quotation without a reference link? Shame on you.

Read and learn, if you can, these technical papers from MOSFET MANUFACTURERS and the forum of the major parts supplier:

http://www.irf.com/technical-info/appnotes/para.pdf

http://www.digikey.com/techxchange/message/9251

http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Parallel_Operation_of_Power_MOSFET_.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b426db703ad9&fileId=db3a30431ed1d7b2011eee77009e547a&ack=t

http://www.microsemi.com/document-portal/doc_view/14693-eliminating-parasitic-oscillation-between-parallel-mosfets