Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Perhaps it is you that should read the patent...

MarkE is correct.  The patent discusses coils that are wound and connected in such a manner as to reduce inter-winding capacitance.  The patent does not discuss connecting secondaries in a manner that would cause them to buck the voltage produced.

In the related patent image posted above, only if the two middle leads of the secondary windings were connected together, would the coils buck as you would have us believe.  As drawn, the secondaries do not buck, but the effective capacitance between pri and sec is reduced (i.e., partially canceled).

Also, the use of the word 'amplifying" to describe the transformer action discussed in the patent is a bit misleading at best.

PW - Youre never going to understand!

I have to just shake my head and feel sorry for your pitiful Nincom Poop Non-Sense!!!

What you think of as Bucking and what these Coils actually does is only clear if one has been paying attention and not Assumed and guessed at their own conclusions!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

EMJ,

A few pages back, member "Magnethos" posted this link to a youtube video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDH7s3IMTtE

What would you estimate (or guesstimate) the amount of power flowing to be in just the single loop of heavy wire when the current flow indicated in that loop is 80 amps?

(Let's assume that the wire loop is made of 2-0 copper with a 2 foot circumference)

PW

PW - I used to regard you as a smart person, skilled and respectable, you're proving to be quite the opposite!

Are you capable of looking at anything with a fresh, clear mind? Looking for possibilities all without jumping to wild conclusions like MarkE does! MarkE is an Idiot! Maybe you should try less to be one!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

The patent states its intention right off the bat:  Reduce interwinding capacitance.  "The object of this invention is to reduce the capacitive effects in transformers adapted to be used for ampliying high or low frequency alternating currents. ... Figure 2 shows a circuit arrangement in which the secondary is divided into two secitons.  The mutual capacity of the turns is diagrammatically represented int he figure by dotted condensers.  The electromotive forces produced by the capacitiave coupling are indicated by dotted arrows.  If now the entire seconary is traversed from the terminal A t the termanl B the said capacitive forces are found to neutralize each other so that production of a potential difference between the terminals A-B is prevented by CAPACITIVE transmission. ... The same curvilinear or ortary directio of the two sections results in an induced magnetic flux having the same polarity in each section.  ... On the other hand, the capacitive fluxes opposite polarity, ..."

The windings are as I told you wired in series.  Figure 1 shows a secondary that is not split, and Figure 2 shows a split secondary.  You really ought to try harder to understand your own references.

MarkE - Because you're an Idiot, and make wild ASSUMPTIONS that clearly suit your preconceived ideas, which proves you to be nothing more than a Blabbering GOON, I will spell this out for you:

To all following.

Just a little more data: SEE Attached PDF

On Google: http://www.google.com.au/patents/US1702771

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

WHERE have I said that this was Bucking Coils?


CLEARLY, the Objective, as I stated:

The object of this invention is to reduce the capacitive effects in transformers adapted to be used for amplifying high or low frequency alternating currents.

Is NOT BUCKING COILS, but because you have ASSUMED THIS, proves that you're an IDIOT!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[MileHigh]

LOL, I think that Chris saw what appeared to be a bucking configuration at first glance and he saw the word "amplifying" and thought that he found an old patent to backup his nonsensical proposition.

Now he is back pedalling and calling two of the most brilliant people on this forum idiots.

It's quite a spectacle!

[EMJunkie]

LOL, I think that Chris saw what appeared to be a bucking configuration at first glance and he saw the word "amplifying" and thought that he found an old patent to backup his nonsensical proposition.

Now he is back pedalling and calling two of the most brilliant people on this forum idiots.

It's quite a spectacle!

MileHigh - The only spectacle around here is you - Seems you've been the target of quite a round of negative Posts!

How about you Un-Invite yourself and go back to investigating your theoretical Paper Bag. No one likes your constant Idiocy's!

OMG you're an Idiot! Even I am embarrassed to have you here! I bet you feel even worse!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org