Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[gotoluc]

@ MarkE &PW

Below are 3 scope shots.
I have placed one of my large caps between the battery and motor,and the small cap across the brush wires as recommended. I have a 1 ohm 10 watt CVR on the negative side between the large cap and battery-->the blue trace is across that CVR. The yellow trace is across the input wires,probe between the large cap and battery on positive side-->common grounds together of course.
Scope shot one is with the scope set to average x4
Scope shot 2 is with scope set to sampling
Scope shot 3 is with scope set to peak detect.

Is this still to noisey on the input for my DMM's and/or an analog meter?.

Hi Brad,

great work as usual

I assume the ch2 0.760 volts is with the circuit and globe operating?
Can you do a scope shot of just the motor operating (no circuit and globe) so we have both to compare.

Thanks mate

Luc

[allcanadian]

@EMJ

I agree, the cost, Time away from Family, and Monetary, is massive for some of us!

Yes, low life scumbags will always try to benefit from others hard
work! So be sketchy, don't show all, make others work hard for it. Let the
pieces of the puzzle fit for only the ones willing to put the hard work into it.
For it is only them that will be able to make it work anyway!

Others, the Office Chair Professionals, can never comprehend, never see for what this really is, only imagine what can be done!

I remember I used to think like that but then somewhere along the line as all the pieces of the puzzle started coming together I simply changed my mind. It was never for me to prove anything to anyone other than myself and I decided I am going to give it all away, no strings attached, on a silver platter when I'm ready. Why... because I can and to prove to myself that I am nothing like them.
I'm sure many would like to wrap it up with patents and contracts but that is not the way it's going to happen because the choice is mine and mine alone. You see if we claim to know better and want to do better then we need to prove it with our actions and becoming everything we say we are not is not the way. I will not become them nor will I resort to their ways and that is the whole point in my opinion. If we are going to claim to be different then the change must start with us... I refuse to judge or hate it is not the way forward.

AC

[MileHigh]

Hi Chris ,

Yes is true , people sometimes forget about the time that we expend without family and friends when make research.
People need to put hands to work not simple wait the "things" follow down .
People always try to benefit from others every time trying the easy way,   is in their nature .

The problem sometimes to start  is the doubts and confusions created by "agitators" that promote resignation and denial of some phenomena like the one discussed here.
The trials and tests that are required for some ppl are not always fair and are just an excuse to dissuade people from "trying" and observe with own eyes some of these type results.
Things are changing, most people also yearn for this change, and not even all odds may prevent this change in global consciousness.

Good luck to all!

Honestly, you and Chris are examples of enthusiasts thinking the opposite way you should be thinking.  You are prejudging a situation without having all the information and analysis completed.  Not to mention the silly demonization of good people.

Example #1:  "The problem sometimes to start  is the doubts and confusions created by "agitators" that promote resignation and denial of some phenomena like the one discussed here."

The truth is that you have no idea at all if there are any "phenomena."   You need to have the wisdom to not jump to conclusions.

There are no "agitators" here.  That is an irresponsible thing to say to try to advance your own personal "us vs. them" agenda.

Example #2:  "The trials and tests that are required for some ppl are not always fair and are just an excuse to dissuade people from "trying" and observe with own eyes some of these type results."

The trials and tests are perfectly fair.  Mark and Picowatt bring a wealth of experience and knowledge to this forum.  You have no idea how good it is and how lucky you are that they contribute to this forum.

There is no "excuse" to dissuade people from doing their own testing.  That is patently false and you are just "spinning."  There are no "results" yet.  The only thing we have right now is ongoing testing.  That is another false statement from you.

Nelson, when Tinman completes his investigation with the help of Mark and Picowatt, if the final results of the investigation are not what you were expecting, I challenge you to come back here and post a public apology for your incorrect statements and for your impugning the characters of good people around here.   I want to see you be just as accountable for your actions and statements as an engineer is accountable for his actions and statements.

MileHigh

[tinman]

Hi Brad,

great work as usual

I assume the ch2 0.760 volts is with the circuit and globe operating?
Can you do a scope shot of just the motor operating (no circuit and globe) so we have both to compare.

Thanks mate

Luc

I will do that tomorrow,but for now im hitting the shower,then the hay. It is exactly 0*C here ATM lol,and i have work tomorrow-6am start. I believe i will once again be deicing my windscreen.

[tinman]

Tinman,

Does the scope/CVR measurement agree with the inline ammeter (DMM)?

800mV across 1 ohm?

PW

The scope shows 760mV across the CVR,so that is 760mA. My DMM was reading 746 mA,so a 15mA difference. I did not have the DMM in the circuit during the last test with the CVR in play,nor did i have the caps in play when using my DMM to measure current. The DMM's CVR is only .2 ohms as well,so less power would have been dissipated across the CVR of the DMM.

As we are talking 9.5 to 10 watts of power,i think my DMM done a very good job at reading the current without the filtering cap's-->as they always have.