Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Hi,

I think also that Clemente Figuera used some sort of bucking coil in his 1902 patent where the "induced circuit" as he called was sandwitched between two inducers. I understand your point, and it is good idea to avoid deaviating from the concept you have shown

Figuera 1902 patent. http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/docums/30378.pdf

Hi Hanon,

I agree, it is the same principal. Many devices in History use this Principal.

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

Hi Hanon,

Good Question!

What do you mean by "loose coupling" ?

Loose Coupling, or some like to use the term Leakage Inductance is basically either a Gapped Core or a Set of Coils that are not tightly Coupled. This could be in the form of an Input Coil that is also gaped slightly on a different Core.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductance#Coupled_inductors_and_mutual_inductance

or: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leakage_inductance

It is that you are using all air cored coils?

No - I have not had any luck with Air Cores!

In one of your post you said that you used plastic spacers in your proof of concept video. Could you define clearly the required scheme?

Experiment is the best way to learn. In the video, I used a CRT TV Flyback Ferrite Core. Picture below (from the Net - not mine) They come with little spacers, plastic normally. Sometimes they are gapped with the former. Its very simple! Keep it simple!

Below I have also attached a Picture of my early device. Blue Arrow = Output Coils - Red Arrow = Input Coil.

The best example I can give for Loose Coupling is Paul Raymond Jensen - Picture Attached: See the gap on the middle leg:

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

@ALL

Can anyone tell my why Loose Coupling or a Leakage Inductance is necessary? The answer is in one of the Videos posted in the first post to this thread!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[Jeg]

Hi Chriss

I attach two images for helping me to express my question.

At first image, we can see your arrangement where two bucking coils are in series in the same axis. In this mode we have a self canceling magnetic field. But the same time we have also a canceling E-field as vectors are in opposite directions. The same time, Floyd Sweet said:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-Field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E"

So, wouldn't be more appropriate in order to follow this technique to arrange our coils as in the second attachment?  In this second attachment bucking coils are the one close to the other in a parallel axis. In this position we also have a canceled magnetic field and the same time we have a sum of both the E-fields. Like Ed. Leedskalnin did in his pmh device where one coil is parallel to the other in a curved iron core. What is your opinion on this?

Thanks

[Jeg]

@ALL

Can anyone tell my why Loose Coupling or a Leakage Inductance is necessary? The answer is in one of the Videos posted in the first post to this thread!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

I think i saw somewhere in your videos that is for adding more drag or magnetic resistance to the return path of the secondary induced magnetic flux ? I will check again.