Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 100 Guests are viewing this topic.

minnie




  When I was a kid we had a bucket up the garden, manual lift pump in the yard,
candles and wood for heat and light. Food and fuel was on ration but we were
lucky living on a farm with access to rabbits etc.
    Nowadays I still can hardly believe the Internet, the ability to correspond with
you lot in seconds. We've got a Tesla S with more than enough solar to run it
a decent part of the year. The Hubble telescope is absolutely awesome, those
images are simply mind-blowing.
    My question is this, is there anything wrong with the current take on physics?
You get the likes of Distinti tearing up huge chunks of text books and there's old
Ken Wheeler calling Einstein an idiot and QM. bullshit.
    There must have been billions of electrical machines made by now but so far
there haven't been any cases of them accelerating out of control except for old
John Searle.

Magluvin

Was putting things on the table last night and had a thought just to wind a core with just 1 coil, as the secondary would not help in detecting flux across the hole.

The wire is about 21ft to be near 4ohm. Still gotta dig out the hall from the core on the board.

Will monkey around with it tomorrow.

Mags

tinman

Not long ago got the new transformer finished.
First test show an efficiency of 97.76% ;)

Update,and video tomorrow.

minnie




I came across this on youtube "The Lorentz Force" Nick Moore.

tinman

Maybe it's time to have another look at what field it is that actually is inducing the EMF/current flow in the secondary of a transformer.

I have built a toroid transformer with an inner core and winding before,but as i used a ferrite core as the inner core,and steel putty as the outer core,it was said that the inner secondary was putting out more power than the outer winding because the inner core had a higher permeability. So this time,both the inner and outer cores were made from the same cast iron powder mix-so as to keep the permeability the same value throughout the core body.

Specs on the transformer.
The turn ratio of the primary and two secondaries is 1:1:1-->all are 70 turns each. The inner secondary of course uses less wire,in fact,about half that of the two outer windings<-- see pic for details on amounts.
The primary and outer secondary were wound on together.
The inner core was wound,and then a rap of teflon tape was wound around the windings for protection. 1/2 of the outer core was poured into the mold,and the inner core and winding was set into the !still soft! outer core material. The remaining outer core material was then poured on top to form the rest of the outer core. The casting mix was made quite dry-just enough resin to make it pliable. this was then vacuum bagged to remove all air pockets in the casting.

This experimental transformer performs exactly as the first one did i built some time back with the ferrite inner core,and steel putty outer core. So for this reason i have to eliminate the thought that that transformer was performing the way it was due to the higher permeability of the inner core.

The reason for this design is as follows.
As stated and depicted by Poynt(and others),the E field is strongest at and around the outer edge of the transformer core,while the magnetic field/flux is contained within the core. So one would think if it is the E field that is inducing the EMF/current(when loaded) flow through the secondary,then the outer secondary that is wound alongside the primary would have a stronger coupling to the primary,and produce more power than that of the inner winding <--which dont forget,has about half the amount of wire also. But as can be seen by the picture and scope shot's below,that is not the case at all. In fact,the inner winding that has half the amount of wire,and about 1/3rd the cubic area of that of the outer secondary,puts out about twice the power of that of the outer secondary.

So this begs the question-->how can it be the E field that is inducing the secondaries,when the inner secondary that has less wire,a smaller cubic area,and is in a weaker E field than that of the outer secondary,but is producing more power out for the given power in than that of the outer secondary.

Something to think about.
The inner secondary is immersed in the magnetic field that is contained within the core(apparently),while the outer secondary is not(apparently)
You will also note that the inner secondary is under load by way of the LED being brightly lit,and the outer secondary has no load yet,as the LED is not lit.

The two scope shots below
Scope shot 1-is across the two secondaries. Yellow trace is across the outer secondary,and blue trace is across the inner secondary.
Scope shot two-same as 1,but with the scope probes on the output side of the FWBRs.