Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

Hahahaha this is hilarious!

Keep behaving like a Clown, your audience grows by the minute!

I am enjoying this!

Im just hanging around,hoping you post a couple more of those !Sound math! video's,by !!top of the wozza!! EE guy's,who use non true RMS meters to make AC power calculations-->using voltage only lol.

You really do crack me up Miyagi--you really do.

I actually thought you posted it as a joke,but i now see you were serous 

[tinman]

 author=Mr.Miyagi link=topic=15395.msg529007#msg529007 date=1546008616]

Inadvertently you're advertising Chris's Technology, the technology you tried to thieve

Aint it funny how i never tried to build Chris's POC,but he tried so hard to build my RT.
Wonder why that was? 
But he couldnt even drill the hole in the laminated core 

Hahahaha this is hilarious!

No where near as funny as your !proof of OU! video you posted,of Don Smiths device lol--that was clasic.

For all that missed this !sound math!,by a !top of the wozza! EE guru,check it out.
OU has never been more easy to achieve 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfVomjwqHx8&feature=youtu.be&t=433

your audience grows by the minute!

Yes,and it's all thanks to you,and your funny fails lol.
Cheers 

[tinman]

 author=Mr.Miyagi link=topic=15395.msg529008#msg529008 date=1546008684]
.

Oh, did you see this:

That is the difference between me and you
I make no claims of OU,and yet show my results
You make OU claims,and show nothing.

I refer to your post here:

There are two self running devices that i know of,and have seen running in person--but you simply will not see such devices on public forums such as this one,nor on youtube.

These are not overunity devices,but more so devices with an !unknown! power source. One of them is quite cleverly done,and extreemly simple to build. The other is more complex,and would take a well skilled machinist to construct,and a half decent EE to build the required circuits.

And?
Did you miss this bit
Quote:These are not overunity devices

I see your trying to find where i have claimed OU,but you fell flat on your face again lol.

Bradley, you're a compulsive liar

And yet every post shows you to be the liar lol.

Honestly, is this the extent of your wisdom?

[/quote]

Yes,great wisdom i thought--watching you bury your self with every post you make,while trying to discredit me.

Ah,life is good lol.

[Mr.Miyagi]

Bradley Richard Atherton, you have already buried yourself, have for a long time.

Your credibility is Zero!

The entire community knows you are a Compulsive Liar, its been proven so many times:

That is the difference between me and you
I make no claims of OU,and yet show my results
You make OU claims,and show nothing.

But anyway,that is normally how it is with those that make big claims like your self--they can never back them up with real evidence.

Brad

I refer to your post here:

My self ,and a group of very talented people spent 2 to 3 months working on such parametric circuits not to long ago.
We were getting results with COPs in excess of 200%.

What i will tell you is that current can follow paths not considered to exist. After months of testing,we found that a portion of the input power can travel through mid air. This is the portion of P/in they are missing-they being the people in your posted papers.

There are two self running devices that i know of,and have seen running in person--but you simply will not see such devices on public forums such as this one,nor on youtube.

These are not overunity devices,but more so devices with an !unknown! power source. One of them is quite cleverly done,and extreemly simple to build. The other is more complex,and would take a well skilled machinist to construct,and a half decent EE to build the required circuits.

The first machine make use of room temperature nitanol springs-nothing out of the ordinary there,but how he is able to create the required temperature difference without consuming any power is the clever bit.

The second,more complex machine is a bit more baffling.
I have !as yet! been unable to work out as to why it continuse to run once the power source is removed,while driving the equivalent to a 320 watt load. This 320 watts i calculated quickly by how much water was raised a set hight in a given amount of time--so it is a !round about! calculation.

But as i said,these are the machines you will not find here on public forums.


Brad

Bradley, you're a compulsive liar







Honestly, is this the extent of your wisdom?

[citfta]

Bradley Richard Atherton, you have already buried yourself, have for a long time.

Your credibility is Zero!

The entire community knows you are a Compulsive Liar, its been proven so many times:

The only lies I have seen on this thread are from YOU!  And most of the members of this forum that care about this subject at all know that Brad is not the one doing the lying.  Your posts under several different names prove who the real liar is.  And for your information Chet is not the only one that has complained about your personal attacks. 

You actions are so typical of the know nothings that inhabit this and other forums.  You make big claims and when someone asks for some real proof you attack them as a person because you can't defend your shoddy methods of making measurements.  Brad clearly explained to you why the so-called EE''s were wrong about their measurements.  And he clearly explained to you how the amount of power they were claiming was easily obtained from the battery they were using.  Now if you have some REAL data that shows he was wrong then present it.  Otherwise your personal attacks only confirm you have nothing.

By the way, I worked with EE's for a number of years.  Some of them were brilliant.  And some of them made me wonder how they found their way to work.  Those of us that have actually worked in electronics don't put much faith in a person's title.  It is what they can show that matters.

Carroll