Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

alan

Keep rereading the pdf, it will increase your understanding, at least for me.

SkyWatcher123

Hi folks, Hi jeg, try putting your blue primary coil in between the partner coils, not on top of them and see what you get.
That is how mine is essentially and since you are using DC pulsing, you might see output and a lowering of current when loaded, maybe, at least that's what mine does.
Then again, mine is driven with a trigger wire, so that is different to yours.
peace love light

EMJunkie

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
@EMJunkie:

I have enough material cluttering my house to try your partnered coil idea. Thinking about a test set up some question come to my mind.


core:


1) Is it better to use a simple Ferrite rod (e.g. 6 mm diameter, length 60 mm) or rather a core from a TV fly back transformer? I also have various transformer cores (consisting of two parts, like two U-shapes or two E-shapes)? Or a steel core (steel bolt or softer nail)?

No limits really! I prefer to use a Closed Core, E.G: C Cores but that just my preference for this type device.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM


number of turns for the windings (see attached drawing taken from your Video):


Yes good start! 40-60 AWG 32 or around there for input, 200 or so turns of AWG 18-22 or so on the output. Approx!

This may change depending on the core. Coercivitity and all those things...

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
2) Is the number of turns specified in the attached drawing reasonable? (If not, please suggest a useful number of turns.)

Again yes good to start around here.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM

placement of the input coil (green wire in the attached drawing):


It can be anywhere you like, I have drawn like this to show, that, its best to couple to one coil more than the other.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
3) Is the primary (green) wound over just one of the partnered coils or over both?

same as above, above, underneath or to one side of the coil. Try to fine the best results for you.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
4) The partnered coils are wound directly over the core and the primary is wound on top?

again, same as above...

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM

input signal:


Input? Sine or square!

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
5) In your video you seem to have some sort of square wave as input (to the green coil = primary). Could it alternatively be a sine wave signal from an audio amplifier?

yes, drive as you wish.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
6) Is it better to use a square wave signal or a sine wave signal (pure AC) as input?

I like a sine wave for this configuration. But any will start you off.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM

frequency of the input signal:


You need to find the best frequency. Most of my devices have been good at around 50Hz to 5KHz but my friends runs at 33KHz

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
7) The frequency of the input signal must some how depend on the core material. In your tests, in what frequency range was the input signal (e.g. 50 Hz to 30.000 Hz)? Must the frequency of the input cycle be varied to find an optimum output?

see above

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
8: If it was a square wave signal, is a 50% duty cycle o.k., or should the duty cycle be varied to find an optimum output?

yes start with 50% dc then work from there. 50% dc will likely be the best for many devices

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM

what to do with the output:


Resistive Loads! Always! Stay away from all others for the moment! Wire wound Resistors can be problematic also!

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
[/b]
9) The partnered output coils are connected in series as in the attached drawing?

yes, you can change later if you wish. Aim to get going first!

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
10) Is it o.k. to shorten the partnered coils (which are connected in series) with a shunt (e.g. 1 Ohm or 10 Ohm or 100 Ohm) in order to measure output with a scope probe over the shunt?

do what you wish.

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM

Chris, you could copy and paste my questions and just add a short comment to each (most of them need only a Yes or No or a few words). I know it is a lot to ask, sorry.

Ok?

Quote from: conradelektro on January 23, 2015, 08:09:15 AM
Greetings, Conrad

Happy to see you're back with us Conrad!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

EMJunkie

Quote from: hanon on January 23, 2015, 09:35:25 AM
Exactly this is my main concern. I wrote post #32 with a totally simetrical setup which could get rid of that problem. That setup was based on Clemente Figuera patents.

I guess that by now just want us to test the simpler device and avoid going into modifications without testing the basic scheme.

Regards

Hey Hanon,

Yes youre right, this is something to keep an eye on!

I have really tried to give the absolute most basic inception of this Technology! It can be improved!

I really don't recommend to go improving it until an understanding on how it works first.

Really important to just understand it first!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

EMJunkie

Quote from: Erfinder on January 23, 2015, 10:56:18 AM
http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/dlattach/attach/146361/image//

These two are not the same, only one should be considered at all, when you know what you are looking at, the one you want sticks out like a sore thumb.  The other should be discarded because it has absolutely no relation to that which is desired.  In my opinion and experience the idea which is being expressed is that we want to reproduce the conditions found between turns, between coils. 

I have read all you offer Chris, lots of good info.  Like you I'm not interested in the measurements, more in whats happening and why.  My work in this are has led me to conclude that we have two types of magnetic interactions.  Namely the interactions found between turns, and the interactions which take place outside the turns.  You want folks to see what you see, good luck with that, folks have to be able to see it for themselves.  All have been exposed to this from the beginning, hell generator action itself is repeating this condition, and yet, all are oblivious to its significance, its deeper meaning.  Anyway, keep doing what you're doing, if one listens, really listens and gets what you are saying you were successful. 

Things get really exiting when you change your perspective, you find hope in a hopeless situation. 


Regards

@Erfinder and ALL

Yes Sir! This man knows what he is talking about!

What a breath of Fresh Air!

Yes, there is a "Preferred" configuration! Its in 3D, in all my animations. The other should be dropped because it is not really the same. Although it can show results, its not the same!

Agreed, Magnetic Interactions, there are two at least!

QuoteYou want folks to see what you see, good luck with that, folks have to be able to see it for themselves.

I really want the world to become what it should be, not what its been limited to! Human Species can do SO much better than where we are at the moment!

QuoteAll have been exposed to this from the beginning, hell generator action itself is repeating this condition, and yet, all are oblivious to its significance, its deeper meaning.

Exactly! The poll is showing some good results so far. Some really like the Gremlin entry  ;)

QuoteThings get really exiting when you change your perspective, you find hope in a hopeless situation.

Yes Sir! Exciting, New Hope, a real positive future opens up where there was none before!

People must move forward and evolve of the end will be nigh.

Thank You Erfinder for Posting! I needed to see a post like this!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!