Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 224 Guests are viewing this topic.

Void

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 01, 2015, 06:52:53 PM
Please see the datasheet attached below. I have a few of these that were donated to me during the Ainslie testing. They are pretty inexpensive:

Thanks TK! I will check them out.
All the best...

TinselKoala

@Picowatt: very well said, thank you.

It has always been beyond my understanding why someone would _take apart_ something they believe is capable of producing OU. Yet it happens a lot. "Oh, the prototype isn't available for testing because __________ ". (Insert favorite "dog ate my homework" excuse). "I took it apart" is just one of many such excuses that make no real sense.

For goodness sakes, if you want to take something apart, _build another one_ and take that one apart! NEVER take apart a "functioning" prototype! Especially if it is made from ten dollars worth of COTS parts.

Unless of course... you do not want it tested for some reason.

Another common pattern is the claim without evidence that gets "replicators" all stirred up trying to reproduce the _claims_ when there is no _evidence_ to reproduce. This inevitably results in the claimant protesting that the replicators (all of whom are working quite literally "in good faith") are incompetent shills who can't tell a soldering iron from a hot screwdriver, when the replicators fail to fulfil the _claims_ of the claimant... even though the claimant won't, or more likely cannot do it either. All while the claimant misuses common terms, redefines ordinary phenomena as somehow special, attempts complex measurements without proper understanding of the equipment and techniques involved, and slings insults at those who try to provide missing knowledge. How many times have we seen that exact sequence of events unfold here on this forum and a few others in the same area?

There is _one thing_ and one thing only preventing proper evaluation of such claims, and that is the attitude of the claimant. And these present threads are perfect illustrations of that fact.

A cooperative claimant would have _instantly_ provided measurements to support the claim, and would have been completely cooperative in performing suggested tests, in trying to understand the use of his equipment, in trying himself to falsify his own claims, in providing full and accurate details of the apparatus concerned including part numbers and sources for COTS items. This is after all an _open source_ forum. OUR may not be quite so "open source" as there may be rather involved "behind the scenes" discussions going on amongst various groups of posters there, but the above comments still apply.

MarkE

Quote from: Void on February 01, 2015, 01:41:15 PM
Hi MarkE. Thanks for the reply. Nice drawing! You didn't have to go to all that trouble, but I appreciate the effort.
Yes, OK, I understand that the inductive reactance of the CSR's has to be very small compared to
the resistance of the CSR's to get accurate phase measurements. The CSR's I am using are carbon film type,
I believe, so their inductance should not be too significant. Regarding CSR's, can anyone recommend good
low inductance and high precision 1 ohm resistors (preferably from DigiKey) which I can use as CSR's?

All the best...
Thanks.  I figured one picture could make things very clear.  I see that TK has recommended some resistors.  Those work, particularly if you solder your sense connections right at the resistor body.  I recommend coming off of the resistor with a nice chunk of solid wire, say 20AWG and make a loop connection on one side for the two scope ground clips on the one side and a smaller loop that the probe clip can grab onto on the other side.

Void

Quote from: MarkE on February 01, 2015, 07:15:49 PM
Thanks.  I figured one picture could make things very clear.  I see that TK has recommended some resistors.  Those work, particularly if you solder your sense connections right at the resistor body.  I recommend coming off of the resistor with a nice chunk of solid wire, say 20AWG and make a loop connection on one side for the two scope ground clips on the one side and a smaller loop that the probe clip can grab onto on the other side.

Hi MarkE. Right. Keep the leads as short as possible. Thanks.
All the best...

MarkE

Quote from: Void on February 01, 2015, 07:18:54 PM
Hi MarkE. Right. Keep the leads as short as possible. Thanks.
All the best...
You can make the power carrying leads as long as you need or want.  It is the distance to the body of the current sense resistor to the take offs for the scope probes that you want to hold as close to zero as possible.  I think that poynt99 has some videos where he took twisted pair from such a resistor.  That video is instructive.