Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

Hahaha you're funny! Don't tell me, All Test Equipment is a "very poor choice for looking at current"? Hahaha you're just Funny!

Where did I say anything such as you claim?  The answer is that I did not.  You just keep playing a shrill clown.  Your measurement set-up is atrocious.  A properly planned test set-up to measure the input or the output side reliably might require investment of $2.00.

Just in-case, my Current wave form is 1.7Khz - WELL Within the Meters specs!!!

Statements like that betray that you either haven't a clue as to what you are doing, or want to intentionally mislead.  In either case:  If by "meter" you mean the CC-65A, it has a noise floor of 10mA (65A full scale) and a -3dB bandwidth of 20kHz with no specified phase shift.    We can make an educated guess that the 20kHz is a single pole at T_RC = 1/(2pi*F) or about 8uS.  Distortion starts to be a problem for rise / fall times faster than 3*T_RC or about 24us.

Its built and designed by experts, but its a "very poor choice for looking at current" WOW youre a total fool!

It's fun to watch you play the shrill jester.  If I want to measure line frequency currents in the 5-50A range, the CC-65A is a perfectly suitable and affordable current probe.   Like any other instrument, it is useful when applied with proper respect to its limitations.

Next you'll say Fluke instruments are really UFO's!!! 

There they are:  more court jester antics.

Personally, MarkE I think this is the most ridiculous statement you have ever made! It shows you are emotionally charged, you could be suffering from more emotions than a 12 year old girl with her period!

Your words say a lot about you.

It shows, that in all your self proclaimed greatness, that you have no evidence to say in your self proclaimed greatness that there is an error there!

The glaring error in your measurement set-up is that you do not measure voltage across the same branch through which you measure current.

You can not say, an nor can anyone else, "Its Fake", and all can see that "Something" is in fact going on here and investigation needs to be done!

You've built a circuit all right.  What you have not done with the measurement set-up as shown is set yourself up to obtain any useful quantitative information about its performance.  You might as well have used an Etch-a-Sketch as a DSO.

It burns you! That someone like me, can come along and stump you outright! It really burns you doesn't it MarkE!

Well if you ever manage to stump me then I'll tip my hat to you.  So far, you have set up GIGO and behaved poorly.

So you have to through ridiculous statements around about Test Equipment and Probe connections!

I stand by my statements concerning your test set-up.

Well MarkE, the joke is on you PAL Stumped and Humped! Good luck with your emotions! They oose jealousy and self proclaimed needs!

Again, your set-up is one of garbage in and garbage out.  No amount of stomping your feet or hurling insults at me will change that.

[MileHigh]

Great work stolen from Itsu!

<<<<
Ok,  change of plans with this diagram he.

I have build it using my latest used coils and MOSFET (IRFP260N) with driver (UCC37321) and used a
Russian KD226D diode (which i used as DSRD in other experiments)
The input voltage was 6.7V and the current 240mA.

The screenshots below are at the same place as in the diagram
yellow is the voltage between the 10 Ohm 10W WW resistor and L2,
green is the current probe set at 500mA / div. (so the RMS current value (4.7mA) needs to be taken x50 (235mA)
blue is the gate signal of the MOSFET so we know when its turned on


Will do some more tests screenshots and a video later tonight.


Regards Itsu
>>>>

[EMJunkie]

EMJ,

You would be well advised to drop the arrogance and condescension and try to understand what is being said.

You state that your waveform is 1.7KHz.  That is your waveform's repetition rate , but it  does not describe your waveform's frequency content.  A pure 1.7KHz sine wave will have both a 1.7KHz repetition rate AND have a singular 1.7KHz frequency content (only a sine wave is spectrally pure).  It takes multiple harmonics to generate any non-sinusoidal waveform.

The waveforms you present have lots of non-sinusoidal rectangular attributes indicating frequency content well above your 1.7Khz drive rate.   

To further understand this, it is advisable that you become familiar with your 'scopes FFT capabilities.  Feed a 1K-10K square wave into your 'scope and display the FFT spectrum of that square wave.  Switch between square, sine, and triangle waves (and vary the duty cycle).  It will give you a better understanding of the actual frequency content of various waveforms.

PW   

Picowatt - Understand what your saying, and I don't disagree that there is much more to this than meets the eye. I know a lot of Harmonics are involved!

MarkE is just getting what he deserves, maybe he should think about his attitude 

This may turn out to be nothing, but not to investigate this would be just as foolish! I admit I am not skilled enough to fully understand this, have right from the start! But I am presenting something that is showing incredible things! They need to be investigated!

So the question really is, are you people with me or against? Those against, take a hike, don't post, don't read, just go away. Until we have more answers.

[picowatt]

That answers the question regarding turn on at "B" or "C"!

Thanks Itsu

PW

[picowatt]

Picowatt - Understand what your saying, and I don't disagree that there is much more to this than meets the eye. I know a lot of Harmonics are involved!

MarkE is just getting what he deserves, maybe he should think about his attitude 

This may turn out to be nothing, but not to investigate this would be just as foolish! I admit I am not skilled enough to fully understand this, have right from the start! But I am presenting something that is showing incredible things! They need to be investigated!

So the question really is, are you people with me or against? Those against, take a hike, don't post, don't read, just go away. Until we have more answers.

EMJ,

What is it that you are showing that you believe to be "incredible things"?

PW