Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

@MarkE: I don't see anything wrong with your redrawn schematic. Perhaps EMJ is objecting to the use of the dot convention rather than the use of opposite-sense winding sketches to denote the "bucking" partnered coil configuration. We believe that the two drawing systems are electrically equivalent, and even EMJ seems to acknowledge this when he talks about flipping over one of two similary-wound coils to obtain the bucking effect. At least that's how I'm interpreting that bit.

(I purposely left out the dot convention in my versions of the schematic. Note that in the graphic renderings from earlier in the thread, we have seen the version where the L1 coil is overlaid on the L2 coil and both are wound in the same direction. This is how I constructed my coil set, and I've already demonstrated what happens when the L1 coil is connected "incorrectly" wrt the dot convention.)

[EMJunkie]

E stands for the product of one set and 2 stands for geometrical additions as in other pairs to multiply results as in combinations working together not to double but a multiple of the same.
Prochiro

@Prochiro,

Another very good answer!

Can you add to this some more?

  Chris

[Pirate88179]

@ALL

All wonderful answers but alas we are no closer. Prochiro is the closest but unfortunately this is still not correct.

Where would E/2 come from when we are looking at Inductors and the operation of them? Why would one assume E/H and then how could it double to E?

  Chris

P.S: Floyd Sweet/Tom Bearden wrote about this in the document Nothing is Something

Time has the energy density of mass.  This results in time polarized em waves.  Any electric dipole is already known to be a source of energy.

(From Tom Bearden)

Bill

[TinselKoala]

E stands for the product of one set and 2 stands for geometrical additions as in other pairs to multiply results as in combinations working together not to double but a multiple of the same.
Prochiro

Then perhaps the expression should have read
E/n
where n is the number of coil sets used to make the total E.  (Boldface denotes vector)

Since after all.... 2 means 2, doesn't it?

Except on Bill's calculator, that is....

[EMJunkie]

@MarkE: I don't see anything wrong with your redrawn schematic. Perhaps EMJ is objecting to the use of the dot convention rather than the use of opposite-sense winding sketches to denote the "bucking" partnered coil configuration. We believe that the two drawing systems are electrically equivalent, and even EMJ seems to acknowledge this when he talks about flipping over one of two similary-wound coils to obtain the bucking effect. At least that's how I'm interpreting that bit.

(I purposely left out the dot convention in my versions of the schematic. Note that in the graphic renderings from earlier in the thread, we have seen the version where the L1 coil is overlaid on the L2 coil and both are wound in the same direction. This is how I constructed my coil set, and I've already demonstrated what happens when the L1 coil is connected "incorrectly" wrt the dot convention.)

I knew TK would pick this up as he has done the experiments