Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Farmhand]

In these old clips I used a big toroid with 2 "sets" of coils, each coil or coil set is one coil connected to the coil on the other side, what I
just call 1 coil in the clip means a coil set. All coils are wound the same way but I had a switch which could reverse the direction
of current  through one of the coil sets or disconnect it. There is a 100 or so turn secondary wound under the primaries and I
think I had the neon connected across that by the looks of the clip. When the coils were driven so that current flowed through
them alternately in opposite directions like a set of inverter primaries the effect is just quickened, But when both coil sets are
fired alternately and in the same direction something very different happens of course.

Anyway the point is I tried this setup in one particular configuration and got almost perfect cancellation of each other, like they
cancelled each other out and I got nothing out at all that I could tell and it didn't want to draw any power either, there was an
initial small current inflow then almost nothing except the control circuit power draw, once I realized what I did I had to rewind
one coil set or change the connections or something, I did it by accident with another similar setup and was again initially
stumped as to why I got no output, then realized. Coils are wound turn for turn the same, same lengths of wire even.

Scope shot at the end of the clip is just a cutaway it means nothing I don't think it was even connected. Old clips. funny in a way. 
Second clip has the flyback diodes connected to a charging battery in the usual way so it was charging a battery.

White neon clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGnFHhfwWzQ

Coil switch explained. kinda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhS2RHDq0R0
..

[Void]

The big problem: there is no radiant energy!
According to my understanding "radiant energy" is a word invented by some people who look for "something new".

Hi conradelektro. Well, Tesla in his radiant energy collector patent (685,957) gave examples of what he called 'radiant energy' as high frequency
radiation such as ultraviolet light, X-rays, etc., and therefore this probably also includes gamma rays, and anything that might be higher in frequency than that.
That is what Tesla referred to as 'radiant energy' in that patent application anyway. It appears Tesla was probably referring to any high frequency radiant energy that
originates from the sun, and the cosmos in general.
All the best...

[conradelektro]

..............
Anyway the point is I tried this setup in one particular configuration and got almost perfect cancellation of each other, like they
cancelled each other out and I got nothing out at all that I could tell and it didn't want to draw any power either, there was an
initial small current inflow then almost nothing except the control circuit power draw, once I realized what I did I had to rewind
one coil set or change the connections or something, I did it by accident with another similar setup and was again initially
stumped as to why I got no output, then realized. Coils are wound turn for turn the same, same lengths of wire even.

Scope shot at the end of the clip is just a cutaway it means nothing I don't think it was even connected. Old clips. funny in a way. 
Second clip has the flyback diodes connected to a charging battery in the usual way so it was charging a battery.
..

May be you could connect the output to a 100 Ohm resistor instead of the battery (to be charged). Just the 100 Ohm resistor (or a 10 Ohm resistor) as a load in parallel to the "bucking" or "non-bucking" output coils. And you measure the signal over the 100 Ohm resistor.

If the output coils are in the "bucking arrangement" the signal should be very weak and in the "normal arrangement" very much higher.

With your nice "switch" the difference should be nicely visible.

Greetings, Conrad

[TinselKoala]

Here's how it Works. Below is the efficiency range for LED lamps (30 to 90} Lumens to watts. How do you find out about this? Read the package!

"LED lamp 30-90 lm/W".

Woopyjump's package clearly states the efficiency is 90 Lumens to watts. Right at the top of the efficiency range. That means fully lit 90 X 35 = 3190; His bulb produces 3190 Lumens of light intensity. He achieves this with .6 watts of input power! The manufacturer states it takes 3 watts at 220 volts. That means woopyjump has increased the overall operating efficiency by 5 times. Diveflyfish is up to 40 times with the same transformer!

Anyone who has a light intensity meter or "Lux" meter can easily visualize the difference between 261 and 3190 lumens of light intensity. That's 12 times brighter! That's the difference between a 10 watt and 120 watt bulb. That's like the difference between your glove box light and an emergency search light. There are people on this thread like MarkE and TinselKoala who are working too hard to cover up these extraordinary COP'S.

There are people like Synchro who misrepresent the work of others and who don't understand basic calculations. The efficiency of the light is 90 lumens/watt. The light dissipates 3 watts of electrical power, not 35 watts. It is the "equivalent" of a 35 watt tungsten filament bulb. You cannot take the power dissipation of the tungsten bulb and use it to calculate the lumens output of the LED bulb! That's just silly! READ THE PACKAGE to find out the power draw of the bulb, it is 3 watts, not 35 watts. So it produces 270 lumens when fully lit on mains power.

LED bulbs in general are brighter than incandescent lamps and CFLs of the same wattage. A 3-watt LED bulb may produce anywhere between 240 to 320 lumens of illumination.

http://www.eslightbulbs.com/products/3-watt-led-bulbs

@MarkE,

Most people know what a 40 watt bulb looks like when lit, or a 100 watt bulb. You have no idea what 261 lumens looks like. I do! This last comment of yours is just a bunch of screwy shit to cover the fact that you don't have a clue. You're just some kind of stinking imposter acting like big authority.

You really stepped in it that time. When will you learn respect? When will you learn to calculate properly? When will you learn to stop misrepresenting? Never, apparently. That's why you have to resort to insults, because your "facts" are so wrong it's not even funny any more.

[Farmhand]

I agree with you Void for Tesla's radiant energy collector patent but there are two patents and in one he shows ways to generate
man made radiant energy from a tube of some kind ect. And those are granted patents. Easy to find.

And just to add I see no evidence that he ever claimed any OU from his man made radiant energy such as from the special x-ray tubes and so on. Just sayin. 

I also agree with Conrad in that all the free energy guru radiant energy claims don't seem to include these principals.
Rather they claim a discharging coil is gathering radiant energy or some hokus pokus like that, is my impression from them.

A cleverly constructed device that emitted X-rays or other such radiated energy/particles if shielded in a certain way would be
a directed energy device. And the directed energy could be collected and utilized, sounds a bit hazardous though. 
Tesla did that and I think he shows in one of the patents doesn't he ?

..