Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

FYI:

J.A.D.E. - Is an APP for the US military. It stands for "Joint Assistant for Deployment and Execution."
H.E.L.M. - stands for "HOMELAND ERADICATION OF LOCAL MILITANTS."

Yes, many should be very worried right now. It doesn't matter if your daddy worked for Bell Labs or not, off to the slaughter rooms and into the Big Coffins.

My Point here is, how do you think something like this could get so far, how come it hasn't been stopped already? Because too many turned a BLIND EYE!!!

Human Evolution cant be stopped, EVIL can retarded it and EVIL has retarded it by making everyone think like a bunch of Zombified morons, or Living Dead...

People will have to wake up sooner or later, I hope sooner.

Again, the answer is here:

If you understand what I have given you already, and this statement, there in lies the answer to the worlds Energy Problems. Period.

   Chris

You have "given" exactly nothing, besides lots of misdirection, fake theory interpretations and unsupported claims of unusual performance... which you refuse to substantiate--- because you _cannot_ substantiate your claims with data from properly performed measurements. You have gone "dark" out of embarrassment due to your display of your own ignorance about the use of your own equipment and your inability to provide data which incontrovertibly supports your claims. But apparently your Top Secret Open Source group isn't providing you with what you need to gratify your ego, so here you are again with your insults, misdirections, irrelevancies, paranoia and more false claims.

[allcanadian]

@Mark E

For all that text attacking science you disagree with you have shown no exception to either Faraday's Law of Induction or Lenz's Law.  There have been many people making invalid claims in the past and there will be many more making invalid claims in the future.  Reliable data is what makes the difference between an arbitrary claim and something that we can treat as valid.  The people pitching 1-1 = remarkable have yet to show such a thing.

I wasn't actually attacking science nor do I expressly disagree with it as you seem to be implying... I do however have issue with others interpretation of it. I would also agree many have made invalid claims and many might continue to do so however this in no way implies this will always be the case.


Did you read and understand the exponential growth of knowledge?. As we speak knowledge is effectively doubling on an annual basis however according to the graph curve very soon it will double every six months. Now what do you believe this means Mark?, to me it means we will gain new knowledge leading to new understanding and we should be clear we are not speaking of what is known at present but new knowledge. At which point we might ask the question, if this is really new knowledge then can it co-exist with what we consider old knowledge?.


You are trying to argue that nothing can change and yet everyone here knows intuitively that it must and in fact it will with or without our consent. The fact remains that everything is changing in one way or another and to presume the future must be dictated by the past is a misguided venture in my opinion. We will learn, we will understand and we will move forward... that's the way it is Mark.


I find the contrast in perspectives fascinating, you are trying to argue Faraday and lenz Law are irrefutable to a person who saw a craft accelerate to astronomical speeds in seconds and leave Earth's obit. As such I have seen the future first hand and I'm not so sure it has room for people stuck in the past. The future is coming and it is simply a matter of time.


AC

[EMJunkie]

You have "given" exactly nothing, besides lots of misdirection, fake theory interpretations and unsupported claims of unusual performance... which you refuse to substantiate--- because you _cannot_ substantiate your claims with data from properly performed measurements. You have gone "dark" out of embarrassment due to your display of your own ignorance about the use of your own equipment and your inability to provide data which incontrovertibly supports your claims. But apparently your Top Secret Open Source group isn't providing you with what you need to gratify your ego, so here you are again with your insults, misdirections, irrelevancies, paranoia and more false claims.

TK,

When you are able to put the meaning of what I have said, and the technical how to, together, once you understand, you will see. If you took some more time to actually read and understand what I have said, instead of jumping to conclusions, then you will see.


It is so simple:

*************************************************************************************************************************


Induction = dPhi/dt
Lenz Law = -dPhi/dt


What does 2 x -dPhi/dt equal?

Not (-) anything does it!!! 

WhaLa - Like Magic - Lenz's Law is gone.

*************************************************************************************************************************


Again Floyd Sweet: (Think Superposition)

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields
remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

So, the question begs, is NOTHING really something? Of course it is. Nothing = Magnetic Field ((-) Lenz Law x 2) = 1 or E/2 changes to E.

Simplified: 2 x -1 = 1

Why 2? Because there needs to be 2 output Coils, or  "Partnered Output Coils"!!!

Once you are able to think clearly about this, see the Light, you will! You will see how basic this is!

So, have I given anything, Yes I have, can you see it, no you cant, can you conceptualise it, no, not yet, will you be able to? This is up to you!

P.S: I thought I would use LOTS of Bright Colours to point out that your "Dark" comment is just silly.

[TinselKoala]

Of all the people on this forum, I think I may be the _least likely_ person to have 'Jumped to conclusions' regarding what you have posted and what you have done and claimed to have done.

I see perfectly clearly that you are unable to support your claims with solid evidence of any "overunity" performance at all. I saw, months ago, that you do not grasp basic concepts of power measurements or the usage of your own test equipment. Has any of that changed? If so, DEMONSTRATE IT. But of course we both know that you will not -- because you cannot.

You are right about one thing though: the closer to being perfectly matched your "partnered output" coils are, the closer to ZERO will be your output, and the more of your input energy will be wasted in heating up components of your drive circuitry and coil cores.

You quote Floyd Sweet? Why not Eric Dollard or John Bedini, or Aaron Murakami? LOL.... you have no clue about electronics or the physics of electromagnetic induction.

[EMJunkie]

You quote Floyd Sweet? Why not Eric Dollard or John Bedini, or Aaron Murakami? LOL.... you have no clue about electronics or the physics of electromagnetic induction.

TK, you really think Eric Dollard or Aaron Murakami have anything substantial?

Of all the people on this forum, I think I may be the _least likely_ person to have 'Jumped to conclusions' regarding what you have posted and what you have done and claimed to have done.

Absolutely you have!

I see perfectly clearly that you are unable to support your claims with solid evidence of any "overunity" performance at all. I saw, months ago, that you do not grasp basic concepts of power measurements or the usage of your own test equipment. Has any of that changed? If so, DEMONSTRATE IT. But of course we both know that you will not -- because you cannot.

I am not perfect, never did claim to be. But, I have been able to move to territory that you TK have not been able to move into. Are you happy with measuring a Lossy system all the time? The New Oscilloscope, will be put to good use if you ever get it, for measuring nothing but a Lossy System. Because that is all you can accept, its all you expect. Its like giving an Oscilloscope to Steve Wonder!!!

You are right about one thing though: the closer to being perfectly matched your "partnered output" coils are, the closer to ZERO will be your output, and the more of your input energy will be wasted in heating up components of your drive circuitry and coil cores.

The line I was waiting for from you. Your "ZERO" actually describes your understanding. What you expect is what you see, not what is really there! I have 3 really good video's I have shown for many years that show your Total NON-Sense to be words of a person that simply cannot know any better. You can not learn, or understand, grasp, or even connive reality if you have ruled it out and denied it!

I have already shown you that there is NOT "ZERO" on the output, "ZERO" only refers to the Effects of Lenz's Law. But I already know that you can not see basic principals that clearly are being replicated globally by many people.

But; You are right about one thing, if an individual does not Listen, Pay Attention, Understand and Read the Information Given, If one cannot follow BASIC Circuits and Instructions, then that Individual does get exactly: "ZERO"

Which, is Exactly WRONG!!!

   Chris