Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[nelsonrochaa]

Now ask yourself how many, if any, of those devices were proven to be real?  None. Zero. Zip. Nada.  Not even one.

Your delusional understanding of reactive power shows that you still do not even grasp the basics of electronics or electricity in general.  Show us how you can run your house on reactive power.  Heck, show us how you can light even a single led using reactive power.

You can't and we all know why...and, hopefully by now, you do too. (But, probably not.)

Bill

Is that your question about reactive power that you talk ?

Man you simple make a pejorative  statement about someone and  that is much different of a question.
You had the right to say what you thought, I also feel the right to ask you to stop saying nonsense.
Do You think you already belong to the club of pundits?
Just because you do not agree or do not understand the work of someone does not mean you can jeopardize a person or their work.
We understand that not everyone agrees with the topic created by Chris, but can not because the validity of his work only because they do not get the same results.
It can be frustrating understand when the results do not appear.
There are many people who even without consent, are not here to "attack" people or jeopardize their competence. ok?

So let the show run ,  no hard feelings .
 

[Red_Sunset]

...........................
.........................
So let the show run ,  no hard feelings .

Cool move my friend,  Peace !!

[NickZ]

   Can't we all just agree to disagree, without the insults, and without the personal attacks???

   While some of us are really trying to get something working, even if it's just a little led bulb to light perpetually. Here's
what was said by the ex-head of the Lockheed Skunk Works, concerning what they have already achieved. (attachment).
   
   Some of you may also want to watch some of the videos by John Lear on YouTube, for more insight as to what is
really going on behind our backs, at least in his opinion.
   
   Bill:  If you'd like to start a new thread (or anyone else), about what some of us would like to discuss concerning Light, Space Travel, UFO's, and of course any related Free Energy topics, please, do so. As it was your suggestion which you made to me, in the first place.
I'll be there, as there's lots to discuss, and I don't want to intrude any further on any other current thread with these topics.
  You can PM me if you like.
                                           NickZ

[Magluvin]

Einstein said something like, The imagination is greater than knowledge.  But there also has been stories of him being threatened/paid to present some things that are not really how things are.

Mags

[Pirate88179]

Is that your question about reactive power that you talk ?

Man you simple make a pejorative  statement about someone and  that is much different of a question.
You had the right to say what you thought, I also feel the right to ask you to stop saying nonsense.
Do You think you already belong to the club of pundits?
Just because you do not agree or do not understand the work of someone does not mean you can jeopardize a person or their work.
We understand that not everyone agrees with the topic created by Chris, but can not because the validity of his work only because they do not get the same results.
It can be frustrating understand when the results do not appear.
There are many people who even without consent, are not here to "attack" people or jeopardize their competence. ok?

So let the show run ,  no hard feelings .

Nelson:

Of course, no hard feelings.  My only gripe is that Chris has claimed overunity about 30 times now and has not even shown any credible measurements or one single replication.  With a COP of 1.7 (as he has claimed)  you would think that he could light an led with the excess...yet he can't and we know why.

When someone makes extraordinary claims that go against conventional wisdom, it is upon them to show that the textbooks are wrong.  He has not done that.  He makes insults to anyone that dare question his premise of overunity.

Then he began to post about how reactive power can do work.  Great, fine.  Except, everything I have read about reactive power simply says it goes from the plus to the minus back and forth and can not do any work.  So, I am only asking Chris to back up yet another claim he has made...and all I get back are insults and excuses.

Chris claims that JT circuits that can light a bunch of leds from a "Dead" AA battery are junk...ok...fine.  Only problem is...he can't seem to light just one little led from his overunity device.

This makes no sense to me.

Anyway...no hard feelings at all.  I am simply trying to get Chris to post proof...any proof, of his many claims.

Why don't you ask him to do so?  Maybe he will listen to you?

Bill