Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

@Tinselkoala,

Quote from Tesla and Guylasum,

Tesla, from the Pancake patent:

"I have found that in every coil there exists a certain relation between its self-induction and capacity (i.e. capacitance) that permits, a current of given frequency and potential to pass through it with no other opposition than that of ohmic resistance, or, in other words, as though it possessed no self-induction."

Guyla:

"So he drove the series bifilar (coil for electro magnets) with an AC current whose frequency was the same as the self resonant frequency of his series bifilar coil......... "

@Tinselkoala,

The Tesla Bifilar offers zero impedence to change in current direction in self resonance! Where at any time do you test Tesla's A.C. coil with A.C. current?
The current of given frequency and potential Tesla refers to is A.C. Examine the kind of power an A.C. electromagnet delivers along with  it's 120 pole shifts per second?

The Tesla Bifilar coil was the first A.C. electromagnet. They're commonplace today. You fucking retards keep testing Tesla's A.C Bifilar coil with D.C. current, pronounce it a fake and prove yourselves dumber than pigshit in the process! Why not give up on that sorry farce of yours and Milehigh's and finally test the coil for magnetic field strength, the way it's supposed to work, with A.C. current at self resonant frequency? Try and run that kind of current through the single wire coil for comparison Einstien!

What part of  IN EVERY COIL don't you understand?  The Tesla Bifilar coil simply includes within itself an increased capacitance, so its self-resonant frequency will simply be lower than that of a normally wound coil. THIS IS THE WHOLE POINT of Telsa's patent. A normally wound coil, combined with a little bit of external capacitance, can be made to match the self-resonant frequency of the TBC. When this is done the resulting magnetic fields, for a given amount of current, are equal.  You ONCE AGAIN are misrepresenting the truth, due to your lack of understanding of it.

[gyulasun]

...
The Tesla Bifilar coil was the first A.C. electromagnet. They're commonplace today. You fucking retards keep testing Tesla's A.C Bifilar coil with D.C. current, pronounce it a fake and prove yourselves dumber than pigshit in the process!  Why not give up on that sorry farce of yours and Milehigh's and finally test the coil for magnetic field strength, the way it's supposed to work, with A.C. current at self resonant frequency? Try and run that kind of current through the single wire coil for comparison Einstien!

Hey cowboy!

It was you who first brought up the example of a Tesla bifilar which claimed to give a stronger electromagnet versus a single wire coil, see here:
http://overunity.com/11350/confirming-the-delayed-lenz-effect/msg357222/#msg357222   and do you realize the test you referred to used a D cell battery?   and the claim was the electromagnet wound in Tesla bifilar coil fashion lifted up twice the amount of paperclip than the single wire normal coil. This claim is not true because Magluvin, TinselKoala and myself replicated the test and the performance of the bifilarly wound coil was identical to that of the single wire coil.
Now you come along with claiming we should have tested it with AC current: the above example you brought up first also did it with DC current.  So who is the fucking retard?

Gyula

[shylo]

Just a thought , Is it possible since Tinman said he was shorting coils ,that perhaps he was creating a PMH with the short and once the short is removed , it releases the stored power?
The charging of the PMH being the result of the kickback spike from the motor coil being turned off?
Is that even a possibility?
artv

[minnie]

   Yes Koala,
            the configuration of the coil in the induction clip
looks somewhat familiar! Must mean something?
                      John.

[synchro1]

Hey cowboy!

It was you who first brought up the example of a Tesla bifilar which claimed to give a stronger electromagnet versus a single wire coil, see here:
http://overunity.com/11350/confirming-the-delayed-lenz-effect/msg357222/#msg357222   and do you realize the test you referred to used a D cell battery?   and the claim was the electromagnet wound in Tesla bifilar coil fashion lifted up twice the amount of paperclip than the single wire normal coil. This claim is not true because Magluvin, TinselKoala and myself replicated the test and the performance of the bifilarly wound coil was identical to that of the single wire coil.
Now you come along with claiming we should have tested it with AC current: the above example you brought up first also did it with DC current.  So who is the fucking retard?



Gyula

@Guyla,

Shorting the Bifiar across battery electrodes triggers an A.C. LL tank oscillation that imparts permanent field strength to the iron core. The single wire won't play this trick. I "spark charged" the Bifilar with 12V. You guys never charged the coil. D.C. current won't help. Make the Bifilar ring, and the coil spontaineously generates the sine wave. The "ringing" alone imparts a permanent magnetizem in the nail core. "Impulse Magnetization" is different from charging an electro-magnet with D.C. current!