Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[partzman]

Well I have discovered a tangled web of associations and politics here on this forum that involves many people, some my friends, and some I would have never thought would get involved with.

It is disappointing that things like this happen, but many, good people have done their utmost to resolve the situation. So, for this I thank You!

Just so you know, there is one that has done nothing to resolve the recent issues, the part this person played, this I find very disappointing. There are good people and not so good people, maybe this person belongs to the later Group?

It is my opinion that these activities, however, are what hold us back from working as a team and ALL succeeding.

It is for these reasons, and others, that I am very reluctant to share my work, this is the protection I seek, while I do the best I can to share perhaps some of the most important concept's that you could ever learn while in this field.

It has been revealed that Partzman may think there is a Measurement Error in his work. I, however, would believe that the Scope is accurate and that explaining away "Measurement Error" to a faulty Scope Mainboard, after so many tests, is just an easy way to make this all go away...

Benchmark the scope with a Transformer, with known efficiency, and then the question mark on the scope is gone.

This really is a Cup half Empty / Cup half Full situation!!! I prefer to be a Cup half Full person, and stay on the most promising side of Life!

Sooner or later, the road the one takes will become the road that many will take. What road is right for you?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Chris,

I hope I can set the record straight regarding my measurement issues on my PM3 series of devices.

The scope I have been using a Tektronix MDO 3034 with TPP0500B probes and I have experienced measurement errors due to ground loops between the circuits and scope. Simply moving the probe lead that measured the input voltage to the transformer primary affected the amplitude and phase of the probe used to measure the current sense resistor voltage. This greatly affected the scope's Math calculations and would even result in false negative energy results. Tektronix has been very cooperative and has acknowledged that there is a valid problem with my measurements.

At present, the problem has been greatly reduced by the use of only one ground lead connection from the scope placed at the ground side of the current sense resistor from the channel used to measure the voltage across said resistor. All other probe ground leads are removed. This provides the most stable and accurate measurements to date and the bottom line is that the high COP values I reported on OUR are invalid. This discovery was extremely disappointing to me and forces me to re-check other circuitry I had developed that indicated COPs >1.

pm

[EMJunkie]

Chris,

I hope I can set the record straight regarding my measurement issues on my PM3 series of devices.

The scope I have been using a Tektronix MDO 3034 with TPP0500B probes and I have experienced measurement errors due to ground loops between the circuits and scope. Simply moving the probe lead that measured the input voltage to the transformer primary affected the amplitude and phase of the probe used to measure the current sense resistor voltage. This greatly affected the scope's Math calculations and would even result in false negative energy results. Tektronix has been very cooperative and has acknowledged that there is a valid problem with my measurements.

At present, the problem has been greatly reduced by the use of only one ground lead connection from the scope placed at the ground side of the current sense resistor from the channel used to measure the voltage across said resistor. All other probe ground leads are removed. This provides the most stable and accurate measurements to date and the bottom line is that the high COP values I reported on OUR are invalid. This discovery was extremely disappointing to me and forces me to re-check other circuitry I had developed that indicated COPs >1.

pm

Hey Partzman - Thank you for setting me straight!

I completely understand the Ground Loop Problem and that there can be other issues when scope probes are picking up interference, this I have seen and experienced.

Graham Gunderson does have a working device, and you are on the right track, the same as GG. I believe you have proven beyond any doubt that there is something to your device, the ideas behind it, as it stands, and is worth persuing.

Once your GL's are resolved and or Probe interference then I think, with a bit more work, your results may just verify your initial tests.

I think youre doing excellent work, and your ideas are very good with solid foundation!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

In my research into the recent problems, I have found some imposters, some users going under several different names. Some that you would never believe me if I told you who they were. One is a Moderator here!!!


These people must be unbelievably desperate!!! Paid by who?


The extent of this is unbelievable!!!


People that can speak perfect English, starting with posts:  "Sorry for my English"... Posting videos from totally different people!!!


I warn you, the reader - "Trust NO ONE" !!!


Some here are very much not who they would make you believe!!! I had suspected and expected much deception, most of the reason I have shown nothing of value to you, now seeing it, and seeing some of the people involved, I now know, this will never see the light of day, far too many crooks and thieves out there!!!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

In my research into the recent problems, I have found some imposters, some users going under several different names. Some that you would never believe me if I told you who they were. One is a Moderator here!!!


These people must be unbelievably desperate!!! Paid by who?


The extent of this is unbelievable!!!


People that can speak perfect English, starting with posts:  "Sorry for my English"... Posting videos from totally different people!!!


I warn you, the reader - "Trust NO ONE" !!!


Some here are very much not who they would make you believe!!! I had suspected and expected much deception, most of the reason I have shown nothing of value to you, now seeing it, and seeing some of the people involved, I now know, this will never see the light of day, far too many crooks and thieves out there!!!



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Chris

I spoke to a !certain! some one last night on the phone,for quite some time.
It would seem that this whole thing was just a big misunderstanding ,and just got blown way out of proportion.

During that phone call,it would seem that he and his team verified some of your quoted result's--i will leave it at that.

Seems to be an ok guy to me,and on that note,i think you should continue on working with him,as he was quite amazed with the results he got from your work,and only had good things to say about you.

The man in question-and his team,are no Macrame army hacks,there the real deal--as you know already im sure.

So good job Chris,for those that have replicated your work have backed you up.



Brad

[EMJunkie]

Hi Brad, Thanks for the heads up!

Yes, a lot of very good work was done by these people, and also by many others!

We saw some problems where my Forum Rules were Broken, not by the person you spoke to but by others. Some deception on the part of the same individuals that broke the rules.

Its time for a break, I have given this two years here on this forum, and many years before this. 400+ Pages is not a bad effort.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org