Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Chris,

I'm not sure what you are referring to when you comment that I have gone "silent".  I continue to post my work on OUR and if there are periods of time with no postings from me, it is because I have hit a wall in my research.  I'm also a little confused by what I am missing technically as you state above.  So, as an example to perhaps remedy your opinions above, I've attached a paper below which discloses one version of my MEI (Magneto Electric Induction) research efforts.  This was openly posted on the OUR forum under my MEI bench for all to see plus all the up to date results of this work as well.

As can be seen, this device has a negative input power of -21.17w or -33.24w referenced to the sinewave on CH1 depending on the source of current measurement.  The output power is a real 33.2w rms.  This is the type of POC that I referred to in my post.  This is fully documented and replicable by those knowledgeable in the art.  Is this device capable of self running?  At this point in time no, but that is the goal of course once certain technical difficulties are overcome.

In regards to Graham G, I openly provided all my work in attempting to replicate his device both on the bench and via simulation.  I personally concluded that no positive results were going to be seen by my efforts unless he were to provide additional info so I quit on the project. 

pm

Hi PartzMan - You need not defend your work, I am not criticising anyone's work, I was appealing to the lack of direction that was very apparent.

The thing is, you reported good results, and also were heading in the right direction, you either had it working or were very close to it!

You see, Graham G's scope shots tell an odd storey, there is a lot going on in there, much is not apparent because of the lack of Probes on both Output Coils - But, I can tell you this, GG's device works the same, he uses a big Spike to do what we have looked at for a long time. You have, and others have already stated this over at OUR.com:

In other words, an "EMJunkie" type arrangement. Am I thinking about this secondary winding arrangement correctly?

I'm somewhat familiar with EMJ's work but tend to think more towards the energy shuttling in these circuits myself.

Lets hope this doesn't stick, I would hate to see EMJ get credit for an age old non-inductive winding technique.

Logically, what is a Spike in Current?

Yes, its the Time Rate of Change of Fluxes, between two Coils. This is the "Synchronous Rectification" he was talking about. The "Synchronous Rectification" holds both Coils at the same state until TDC, he then drops the state of one coil, causing the Spike, the Time Rate of Change, and we see a massive change in Current on that Coil, it completely reverses its Sine!

Induction occurs all the way through the Cycle, but the Output Coils are in Reverse, Magnetic Fields Opposing for only part of the Cycle. The Field opposition only occurs at the Spike (Black Arrow) - It is at this point where the Magnetic Fields from the Two Output Coils Oppose, is where the excess Energy "Generation" occurs. This ends at the Red Arrow See below.

Please remember, many roads lead to Rome, this is not the only way!

I promise you, if you stay on track, you will succeed!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: Of course, Time is increasing in the X Axis and Amplitude in the Y Axis as we would expect to see in the typical Cartesian Coordinate System.

[EMJunkie]

@PartzMan - Why is it that these two Output Coils Oppose?

How is it that the Sine of one of these Coils can change at Peak Magnetic Field? And change so quickly?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

We must admit, Graham Gunderson has shown a device that Does Tick All The Boxes!!!

It cant be denied, no matter how much people may try to deny it.

Thing is, GG's device supports every single device that has been shown throughout History that has a similar Configuration!

So, what are we looking for? Yes that's right! A Method Of Turbo Charging Electromagnetic Induction Well Beyond What We Would Normally See In An Electric "Generator"

Reducing the total Reflected Lenz's Law Effects back on the Input -0 But we still Need Lenz's Law it is Kinetic Energy!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

I want to answer for PartzMan, but do not want to miss his answer!

I hope the above picture will stimulate some interesting responses!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: You can see the Current wave form here. Look at the Voltage also. Also look at the input, no change, a nearly perfect 90 Degrees is maintained. Why?

[EMJunkie]

"Very soon, the intelligence we create, will surpass the Intelligence we possess, on that day we will become slaves forever! I hope that Intelligence has a Soul!"

"Not that we have not already enslaved Ourselves!"

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org