Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

Brad - I can see that you have not watched the video? I thought you did? We did pass words on this sometime back...


What by-pass???


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

I was thinking about the conference test video,where you can see the input was left disconnected.


Brad

[hyiq]

I was thinking about the conference test video,where you can see the input was left disconnected.


Brad

Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I told everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, Measurements also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I tole everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?

When doing accurate P/in and P/out measurement's,all P/in must be measured and accounted for.



Brad

[hyiq]

you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?

When doing accurate P/in and P/out measurement's,all P/in must be measured and accounted for.



Brad

No it wasn't, what are you talking about?

"you do know that all the output power did not go through-or was measured by  the scope or CH meter's-dont you?"

This is rubbish, two nodes were measured and both nodes were the same, what a bunch of Marlarchy!





Oh hang on, there was a fly on the wall in the next room, its all fake!!!.... What a bunch of BS!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

Very Clearly you can see Brad, 2.0 In and 8.3+ Out and no "By-Pass", as you put it was present. I have shown this in the very clear image above!!!


Now, Out: = 8.378 /  In = 2.0 = ?


Yes, 4.189 Watts in Excess, using Clark Hess Watt Meters...


2 Coils, One Input Coil, LC Resonant, Two Output Coils, yes Partnered Output Coils, Switched, using so called "Synchronous Rectification"... In my very first pdf document, I told everyone that Resonant Input can be used, that the Output did not affect the Input, that Reactive Power would Circulate in the Input... about 2 1/2 years ago now...


No By-Passes, Measurements also confirmed on the Tektronix Oscilloscope - What is there to question here?


Patent Pending is there? Chet K sponsored? Care of Mark Goldes Co?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

I see a very big mistake in the image Chris,and would more than likely explain the large difference in P/in and P/out.
You pride your self in induction Chris,so where do you see the big NO NO in the picture below-the one you posted.
Where has GG made a big error ?.

Many people have looked at this picture,and the video's,but no one yet see's the error 

Brad