Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

You'll need a good wattmeter, which considers the phase shift in HF AC circuits.

The output load is resistive,and so there will be no phase shift.

Maximum values are being used to calculate P/in,and so if there was a phase shift between current and voltage,the end result would be less than that already calculated.

There is also the fact that we are dealing with voltages less than 10 volt's.


Brad

[tinman]

Hi Brad.

Don't forget that a Square wave has a different RMS value.

Can you scope the output waveform I'm pretty sure you'll have a Sinus?

Cheers Graham.

Hi Grum

As i am using a ferrite core,and what could be considered a low frequency for a ferrite core,the wave form remains square on the output,with just a slight curve at the beginning and end of the wave form

The calculated RMS value from both the scope and DMMs,is consistent with the required DC voltage across the bulbs,to obtain the same brightness-as measured with my light meter.

Even after taking all these step's,i am yet to find the error.


Brad

[Grumage]

Hi Brad.

'Twas just a thought!!

Cheers Graham.

[wistiti]

"One has to also ask-why has Wistiti not taken this further,if the results were that good?."

who say im out of this..?   

I simply have give a try to what Chris have shared. For sure im not the most qualified to speculate about the result and im not here to convince anyone except me. So I will not argue or defend any point or result here...

The best way to see it is by trying it by yourself and im glad you,Tinman, finally jump in.

For me these POC are definitively a major component and merits further investigations.

ps: im pretty sure you can achieve better result with more turn on your POC...

[partzman]

Chris,

You have referenced the Preva device previously and indicated there were unique operating properties to the device as shown in his video, so I decided to replicate using a ferrite core wound with three identical windings and operating at 15KHz.  The schematic is attached below and shows all probe connections for identification in the scope pix also attached below.

Referring first to the "Preva Test w_2x100 Ohm Load", the Math(red) channel indicates the true input power to be 1.183 watts.  CH2(blu) is the voltage across R1 and is seen to be 4.793v rms which calculates to .2297 watts.  CH3(pnk) shows 9.766v rms across R2 which calculates to .9537 watts for a total output of 1.1834 watts for a COP = .999.  Very efficient but I see no evidence of OU here.

Referring next to "Preva Test w_2x100 Ohm Load KCL" we examine the currents in the circuit to see if there is any violation of KCL.  The reference channels R1 and R2 are stored current measurements for loads resistors R1 and R2 respectively.  The Math(red) channel shows the sum of the ref currents R1/R2 while accounting for phase and show the result to be 51.16ma rms.  This is extremely close to the input current shown on CH4 which is 51.38ma.  Therefore, I see no evidence of any violation of KCL with the device when operating with loads.  In fact, it can be shown that KCL is also not violated without any loads connected. 

So, IMO the Preva device is a very efficient transformer which is no small feat, but not OU!

pm