Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[hyiq]

Partnered Output Coils or POC also stands for Proof Of Concept.

Brad is a first class engineer, and his results seem be looking good so far.

We all make measurement mistakes, even the best Metrologist's in the world, I have on occasions, and I am no Metrologist, but as I keep saying, Continued Independent Replication of the more common than not, Good Results are more forth coming all the time. Simply, this does work!!!

This Technology is more about looking for effects, the good results will follow, LostFox showed this very clearly.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[hyiq]

Well, anyone?


Any moment's of realisation out there?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

 author=hyiq link=topic=15395.msg499446#msg499446 date=1486418355]

Brad is a first class engineer, and his results seem be looking good so far.

Gee's Chris.
A couple of pages ago,it was this--->

Brad, I used to have the utmost respect for you, but seeing how you deceived the people following your RT work, was a real eye opener for me!

It would seem you only like some one when they are either agreeing with you,or working on your POC type setup,and seeing positive result's.

If i now told you that i have found the measurement error,and the system was quite in-efficient,would i still be getting a christmas card from you?-or would i then be a very low rate engineer?.

Truth is,i have made a few tweaks here and there,and have now lifted the efficiency to an !!apparent!! 118.3%
BUT,the power level's i am measuring here are very low,and so the chance of measurement error is magnified quite some.

In saying that,my DMM's,scope and SG all give the same measurements, +/- 2%
My SG,DMM's and scope all show the same RMS voltage value,and the DMM's and scope(by way of a CVR) ,show the same current value's

Chris
I have a question for you--> what is inducing the current flow in the two secondaries on my toroid setup ?


Brad

[hyiq]

author=hyiq link=topic=15395.msg499446#msg499446 date=1486418355]


Gee's Chris.
A couple of pages ago,it was this--->

Brad, I used to have the utmost respect for you, but seeing how you deceived the people following your RT work, was a real eye opener for me!

It would seem you only like some one when they are either agreeing with you,or working on your POC type setup,and seeing positive result's.

If i now told you that i have found the measurement error,and the system was quite in-efficient,would i still be getting a christmas card from you?-or would i then be a very low rate engineer?.

Truth is,i have made a few tweaks here and there,and have now lifted the efficiency to an !!apparent!! 118.3%
BUT,the power level's i am measuring here are very low,and so the chance of measurement error is magnified quite some.

In saying that,my DMM's,scope and SG all give the same measurements, +/- 2%
My SG,DMM's and scope all show the same RMS voltage value,and the DMM's and scope(by way of a CVR) ,show the same current value's

Chris
I have a question for you--> what is inducing the current flow in the two secondaries on my toroid setup ?


Brad

Brad, truth is, we all need to get on with it and stop the BS. Yes I get very tired of seeing others  being mislead.

Primarily because I have spent so much money and time on learning the secrets to other devices when there were complete lies told about them:

   Magnet Conditioning (Tom Bearden) - A Lie

I spent perhaps 5 odd years, and so much money you would cringe if I told you, to find this was a lie!!!

It is true, no matter what information I posted several posts back, you are a first class engineer, I have always said that, and I do like you, no matter what result you get. You are a roll model for every single generation in front of you - Don't you think we owe it to them to get the Truth Out!!! To be Honest and forth coming with information!!! To do the best we can to Not Mislead, but to be as accurate as we can at the time of sharing information!!!

I do not Diss-Like anyone, I do however diss-like the choices people make and the Actions, or lack of, people take. But we are human, and not one of us is perfect yet. Isn't this our end goal though? Some I like to keep at arms length due to personality conflicts, however.

So, now we have that out of the way...

Well, so far so good - if you can see it, if you can feel it, if you can taste it... then I would say, trust your senses!

Brad is correct, the lower the Power Levels the harder it is to measure. More Noise and other factors come in to it.

Chris
I have a question for you--> what is inducing the current flow in the two secondaries on my toroid setup ?

Electromagnetic Induction is still 100% valid in this configuration and is the reason you have Output (V and I).

To iterate a little further, Electromagnetic Induction is a dependency process, for example:

   1: If there is No Voltage, there can be No Current.
   2: If there is No Current, there can be No Magnetic Field.
   3: If there is No Magnetic Field there can be No Electromagnetic Induction.


So, for Electromagnetic Induction to occur, there must be a Source of Magnetic Field, somewhere!!! Time rate of change is a requirement for the Voltage (EMF) Generation, NOT the Current, as mentioned above, the Current is dependent on the Voltage (along with Resistance)!!! It's true, that any Coil that has a Voltage across it (Active Element due to Induction) will be able to supply a Current, regulated by Ohms Law, which will change in Time!!! This is equivalent to a Magnetic Field Changing in Time!!!

Thus any and All Magnetic Fields Changing in Time can be a Source of Electromagnetic Induction!!!

If this Source is equal in Magnitude in comparison to the originating Source, then there will be a net zero effect, or no Tertiary EMF can be "Generated". Thus timing of the Coil Interactions is critical. Capacitance can be employed to do this, or switching if you have the means. Coils can be arranged to also offset this timing.

I hope those that do not already know this will see the importance here!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

So, "Time rate of change is a requirement for the Voltage (EMF) Generation, NOT the Current," The Current can be amplified, by Feed Back Techniques:

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.24 x 10¹⁸ electrons⁄second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes.

I²R Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field.

You have a System that allows for Electromagnetic Induction Twice.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org



P.S: Steffans new html editor is crap!!!

[shylo]

What's the best wind to get high voltage?
Thin ,lots of turns, as a primary and heavier secondaries?
Or thick less turns, with high turns 2nd's?
Just asking artv