Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[hyiq]

@Itsu - I would recommend to try a few things, compare the end results...

Take one coil off, taking note of the turns direction, and reverse it. Then compare the results.

The reason I say this, is, that there is one configuration that gives better results. Interestingly!

Your Forward Voltages and Current Directions are interesting to compare! This circuit is a resonant Circuit, but the way it works is very interesting.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[hyiq]

Did anyone ever tried to use the bucking coils as input only and put a third, output coil between them, and then use a cap on one of the two bucking coils to bring it out of phase by 90deg. Maybe the reactive field of the coil to that 90deg out of phase primary would be a further 90 deg off and therefor add to the other primary field of the uncapped bucking coil. Just a thought.

Hey Dieter - Yes, I am hesitant to share results, it will confuse others I think. I will just say, my results were not positive as some may think. There is a very good reason for this, but I don't want to go off topic at the moment.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[hyiq]

Brad,

The easiest way to answer your question is with the circuits attached that show the options for series and parallel connections.  These ideal secondaries are located on a core material with a primary winding (not shown) driven by an AC voltage source.

"A" and "C" are series and parallel connections that need no further explanation. 

"B" is a series buck configuration which has no voltage across RL and no current flow in L1 or L2.

"D" is a parallel buck arrangement which exhibits no voltage across RL but has equal circulating currents in L1 and L2.

IMO, the circuits shown by Wistiti, Luc, and yourself are of the "C" type and will normally always be conservative without the addition of parametric, magneto-dielectric, etc, functions.

The Preva device is type "D" with loads in series with each secondary.  Again, this device is conservative without the above exceptions as I demonstrated in my post #7763.

In review of that post I see that I missed answering posts from Chris and yourself so I'll do so here.  Chris, yes the currents shown in the scope pix are confirmed as they are seen.  Brad, the energy lost in the dcr of the inductors, etc is very small (<1%) compared to the overall output.  As I stated in my correction post #7767, the accurate efficiency of my test ended up at ~92%.

pm

Partzman, Brad and others interested:

I can hear everyone asking: WHY?


Well, in every Electrical "Generator", Ohms Law applies, in combination with Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction. What does this mean?


Voltage is directly a result of the Time Rate of Change of the Electromagnetic Flux, the Faster the Rotor Spins, the Higher the Voltage!!!   <<<--- This is a KEY Sentance!!!


The Higher the Voltage, the Higher the Current goes, for a given Resistance, this is simply V/R = I!!!   <<<--- This is a KEY Sentance!!!


So, simply, if there is NO Voltage (V), there can be no Current (I) (In an Electrical Generator) through a Resistance (R)!!!   <<<--- This is a KEY Sentance!!!


And so, the wheel work of Nature, depends on, the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Flux, The Resistance, The Voltage "Generated" and the Current will follow, only in these configurations.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Something very important to see, is the above quote. Partzman's experiments are correct, but incomplete.

For example: In a completely Non-Inductive Coil, there is no Voltage Induced, we all know this, but there is actually a way to Induce Voltage in the Non-Inductive Coil, and if there is Voltage, then there will be Current...

One example we all should already be familiar with is Tariel Kapanadze... How does he Induce Voltage in his Non-Inductive Coils?

Yes, that's right, by injecting a very short Nano Second, High Voltage, Pulse into his Coils via Electromagnetic Induction. Thus the importance of the Nano Pulser we have all studied. The term Non-Inductive is a Miss-Nomer! It is actually incorrect and Miss-Leading!!! Non-Inductive is actually about as Inductive as you can get!!! The problem is, Nature does not want to fly to pieces and an Equilibrium is achieved by ensuring the Balance of Forces at most levels.

Thus my post, I only partly agree... It seems we still have a lot to learn about Electromagnetic Induction, I most certainly do not know as much as I would like to know, although, one has voted 100%


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org




P.S: Question: If the Magnetic Field is Present, and in Opposition, but does not Change in the immediate Space that Conductors are present, can Electromagnetic Induction Occur?

[dieter]

@ Chris, your PS-question:
"and in Opposition" to what?

[hyiq]

@ Chris, your PS-question:
"and in Opposition" to what?

@Dieter - Sorry, I wasn't clear:

P.S: Question: If the Magnetic Field is Present, and in Opposition, but does not Change in the immediate Space that Conductors are present, can Electromagnetic Induction Occur?

In the Context of Non-Inductive Coils as they are Commonly known. So for example, One Coil's Magnetic Field Opposes the Other and as a result, we can not Induce a Voltage (E.M.F) in the Coils via Electromagnetic Induction.

WOW, this has not come out the way I wanted!!!

If the Coils Magnetic Field (dPhi) does not vary in Time (dt), because each is equal and opposite, holding the Magnetic Field steady, with no Change, then no Electromagnetic Induction can occur. Simply because there is no Change in Flux, its held steady, inductively, the Net Force is Zero. But if we can find a way, to change this, and the Coils Magnetic Field (dPhi) does change in Time (dt) and then an EMF Will be Induced, then what we know as Non-Inductive, will then be extremely Inductive!!!


This is what Tariel Kapanadze's very sharp pulses do! A very sharp pulse is injected into the Coils, Electromagnetically an EMF is Induced, because the short pulse is too fast for Field Opposition to Zero the Force out, the Magnetic Fields Oppose but the Coil still has an EMF Generated, and as a result, Tariel Kapanadze's Coils are an Electrical "Generator". Solid State No Moving Parts!!!

There is Real Voltage, and Real Current powering his Loads!!!

So, my very poorly presented point is, what we currently see and think of as Non-Inductive, is a real Miss-Nomer, perhaps one of the biggest we will ever know in our lives!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org