Wheel vs. lever...

[iacob alex]

Hi Supersam!Let's see.So,fantastic can be:imaginary,visionary,romantic,unreal,unsubstantial,illusive,illusory,far out a. s. o. Firstly,play yourself Milkovic"s pendular lever(a stick,a fulcrum,two masses),then you can fix the true signification of your "sticker".All the Bests!/Alex

[iacob alex]

Hi!As I can see the things,if we are really interested to get a gravity engine(a machine which produces/interfere,acts as a drag in a natural energy flow /so to   power  our  working necessities),we can think in the terms of an external gravity "fire" engine.The term "fire" is so extensive,it can be combustion,flame ,flashing light,energy,vivacity...in the forrest of the word-trees,we have a multitude of pointers and connections.The short way,so to detect a possible design for a gravity engine ,is to re-think the Stirling engine,with new twrms.We have the skeleton,the frame-concept design,ready to be restored from the thermal to a gravity consideration.All that we need is a translatory reasoning and practical operation.In a commonplace language:play a lever("high pressure" due to energizing free fall) instead of a wheel("low pressure" due to a weighting measurement) concept  ,if you are intended to start a self-gravity engine.By the way,that's the first rule for an operating engine.Like you set moving,igniting  a flame:the same spring out of energy.A little experience from our ancestors often upsets a lot of theory.All the Bests!/Alex

[iacob alex]

Hi!    The essence of an engine(with an internal of external "fire" source) is the high pressure on the piston.If we consider gravity as a "fire" source,in the most comprehensive manner,a possible gravity engine can be imagined in two ways:in a wheel (many spokes) or in a lever (two spokes) configuration.By the way,a lever  can be considered as a "minimal wheel" symbol.A wheel concept,as consequence of a linear comparative operation ,about   a geometric unbalanced,asymmetric design(intended to be "self") vis-a-vis a vertical line(gravitational fall reference),results in a "low pressure" or physical strain,tension,an equivalent long arm-short arm lever difference multiplied with "1g",that acts as a weighting machine,swinging a little,around a balanced position,no more.Really we play statics. A lever concept(two spokes,arms) attests a free fall time for the long arm(raising the small arm,in the same time),and so we have a nonlinear comparative operation about  a full pendular motion,resulting in a "high pressure": a single long arm-short arm difference multiplied with a "greater g"(remind "falling chimney" effect and 'falling stick" lab demo  ).So,if you want to start a gravity engine,play dynamics ,let it fall,so to get "high pressure".Stirling engine can be a relative of this one,as a concept.this is my opinion...Simplicity is the first step,curiosity and understanding come after.All the Bests!/Alex

[iacob alex]

...can be a shorter expression of the wheel versus lever dilemma,as a starting point to imagine a gravity engine.We have no proof in reality,about any of them ,as a thinking manner to achieve this aim,so the one and the other,have for the time being,an equally status.Again,I come out that,we are living inside a huge natural mass accelerator,an enormous energizing system.This one,gravity,is not primary to inertia(Lex One/Newton),so we can consider it,as an interface to inertia.Inertia,by all means equilibrium;constant velocity,no acceleration.Or "let's the things as they are and as they move".If you want to act in a some way,you need acceleration(Lex Two/Newton),that is change of velocity.This change of velocity,we have for free in gravity.Newton enlightened us,what to do,if we want to change something:to accelerate.When we  increase the velocity of mass,on the horizontal line,we must pay for it.On the contrary,on the vertical line,the increase of velocity(falling mass),it's for free.But ,this fall asks for time,so "g*t".That way "g vs. g*t" can be  a kind of "to...,or not to...",as you like to understand.All the Bests!/Alex

[sevich]

Hi iacob alex,

May I ask if you have a working over/unity pendulim?


also,
iacob alex wrote: quote 
>>>This two stage mechanical oscillator was presented and won a gold premium during the 2002 fair in Novi Sad (patented in 2001) Tesla was from the one and only country...<<<   
end of quote/

Novi sad is a city located in northen Serbia .....Nikola Tesla was not born in Serbia!

Nikola Tesla was born and educated in the town of Smiljan (near Gospic) in the western region of the Republic of Croatia (30 kms from the adriatic sea)