fun observations about the magnetic field

[synchro1]

What part of "couples external energy input" are you having trouble understanding? I assure you that if you successfully isolate your device from all sources of external energy, like specifically vibrations, it will come to a stop. I have no doubt that if it is just sitting on a table top that it will keep on moving. I've seen a torsion pendulum that was so sensitive that it "kept moving" perpetually... because every week somebody parked an 18-wheeler about 50 yards away outside the building and the thing was actually _gravitationally attracted_ to the mass of the truck, and this was enough to keep it swinging. The business of eliminating all outside sources of energy is not a trivial one.

@TinselKoala,

You're partly correct, but if you build and observe the reaction I described you'll realise there are noticable magnetic currents at work between the four Chiral magnets that box the attraction magnet in. Jerry Bayles demonstrates the astonishing difference in positioning balance magnets on opposing sides of his spinning "Chiral Disks". Nature won't permit equilibrium between mirrored magnets. This effect is in no way attributable to external vibration.

Look at this video from Jerry:

"Chiral Magnetic Field Demonstration of a two-magnet system wherein it is proven that a slight difference in the energy density between the left and right sides of a balanced magnetic field arrangement yields a chiral action".

http://www.electrogravity.com/ChiralMagFld/ChiralMagFld_6.mov

[synchro1]

This is a pretty cool video of a large Steel Bearing rotor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gpaPKlyWKM&list=PLDvggocZX1ekD8BaeYnuQ-xU2qJJuEKVV

I wonder if "Magnet Spheres" might roll if attached to a "Steel Center ball" by tiny disk magnet axles? It might help if the magnet spheres were seperated by paddle Wheel blades. It would shift from a monopole rotor to a N-S rotor very easily.

[Low-Q]

Then why in a horizontal lens position moving the magnet in a circular motion yields to a constant counterclockwise rotation? ??  Im still confused

The lens might be horizontal, but the shape isn't. This is a convex lens, and the experiment is happening not in the centre, but off center of the lens where the free magnet is a little angled. One part of the magnet is closer to the hand held magnet, and touches therfor the lense off center of the magnet. When the hand held magnet moves around, ofcourse friction off center of the free magnet will cause it to rotate.


Vidar

[Pirate88179]

This is a pretty cool video of a large Steel Bearing rotor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gpaPKlyWKM&list=PLDvggocZX1ekD8BaeYnuQ-xU2qJJuEKVV

I wonder if "Magnet Spheres" might roll if attached to a "Steel Center ball" by tiny disk magnet axles? It might help if the magnet spheres were seperated by paddle Wheel blades. It would shift from a monopole rotor to a N-S rotor very easily.

I don't get it.  Without Mr. Hand, it will just sit there.  When he adds all of those other balls and the mass is increased, he has to take more effort (and time) in spinning it up.  Am I missing something here?

Bill

[synchro1]

I don't get it.  Without Mr. Hand, it will just sit there.  When he adds all of those other balls and the mass is increased, he has to take more effort (and time) in spinning it up.  Am I missing something here?

Bill

That's nearly 5 pounds of steel spinning around with no axle or bearing. The 2" neo sphere exerts over 100 pounds of pull force. It would take a 3-D printed housing to keep magnets that size seperated. I Imagine an E-Z spin motor like Lasersaber's, with all the coils in series and one Reed Switch would keep the balls Rolling. The coils might need to be soup can size. The "Flux Density" would be enormous!