Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Light = small m WE CAN USE IT !!!

Started by tesla2, March 15, 2015, 05:41:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Vladokv

If I understand well, if you have electrostatic field detector it will sense field earlier than wave reaches it. Object charged by square wave will propagate that field faster when stop charging. That implies that square "wave" travels instatenously, and sinusoidal wave travels at speed C . It doesnt sound logical

sm0ky2

Quote from: Vladokv on March 17, 2015, 09:18:25 AM
If I understand well, if you have electrostatic field detector it will sense field earlier than wave reaches it. Object charged by square wave will propagate that field faster when stop charging. That implies that square "wave" travels instatenously, and sinusoidal wave travels at speed C . It doesnt sound logical

At great distances ( and subsequently greater field strengths) such may be testable, but as it stands in earth conditions, this might prove difficult. Remember that the response time of your 'detector' is also constricted to the velocity of "c".
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

tesla2

Exist Two type EM RADIATION

STATIC and MOTION

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SVuAlKNPcdw/VQVwVcKglbI/AAAAAAAACTM/ghyxuhHCNAw/s1600/CIMG3731.JPG

sometimes velocity is very very important

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1kiLUNIA0zk/VQKtkz5l-uI/AAAAAAAACSI/3kGuQloeYHw/s1600/CIMG3721.JPG


m --V-->           M



when small m is moving V

and  is hiting big mass M You can hear wave ( sound  )





electron --->     <<< EM WAVE 



when electron is hiting EM wave You can SEE wave not hear wave

( it is not sound but it is very similar mechanism electron is exchanging P=M*V with light )



electron = big M

EM wave = small m  SPEED IS HUGE !!!
EVERYTIME WHEN ELECTRON IS HITING EM WAVE WE HAVE NEW WAVE



SUN ------MOON ----------------------------EARTH

please preapare desk ( please make double slits in desk )

Do you see many lines ? BUT MOON IS NOT INSIDE TWO SLITS AT ONE TIME  ? !!!!



THIS WHAT WE HAVE IN BOOKS = ONE BOG FICTION

please study NEWTON   but AGAIN ( important is body Size  B area is much more biger compare to A area )
and DYNAMICA PREASURE not statica
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-W27DEEsOhxs/VQU1RR4AaZI/AAAAAAAACSw/Msi6Mn8_wCQ/s1600/CIMG3728.JPG

tesla2


Vladokv

All this wondering gives final question. What is speed of exiting electron in FEL lasers in function of speed of ongoing electrons? What is Δv of entry electron compared to exiting electron? From data known on relativistic dopler effect electron doesn't lose speed.
My expectation is that Δv is 0. FEL laser gives monochomatic light. It is possible only if electron don't losse own speed during travel trough undulator!
So to quote wiki -> The transverse acceleration of the electrons across this path results in the release of photons (synchrotron radiation), which are monochromatic but still incoherent