Fifty Quadrillion Dollar Energy Discovery Suppressed!

[gravityblock]

As worldwide economic conditions fluctuate, the total worldwide annual end cost to consumers varies. A good round number is $10 trillion USD. That's the global gross retail revenue available to a tycoon who has completely cornered the energy market. If an inventor dreams of his gross income for the life of his patent, 20 years X $10 trillion = $200 trillion.

How did you get the number $50 quadrillion?


Kindest
CANGAS 156

This isn't limited to just the energy market.  Cancer and other medical treatments, desalination of see water to be used by coastal countries for growing crops who has a water shortage, coal into a liquid fuel, ect.  I'm only touching the surface.  LFTR's will revelotionize every industry in this world, along with creating new industries.

The number 50 quadrillion, which I believe came from a professor in the 1940's if my memory serves me correctly, can be found in the video of the original post of this thread.  The professor was more than likely not basing the number on the life of a patent, but basing it on the life of the technology itself.  The number is probably on the low side.

Gravock

[CANGAS]

This isn't limited to just the energy market.  Cancer and other medical treatments, desalination of see water to be used by coastal countries for growing crops who has a water shortage, coal into a liquid fuel, ect.  I'm only touching the surface.  LFTR's will revelotionize every industry in this world, along with creating new industries.

The number 50 quadrillion, which I believe came from a professor in the 1940's if my memory serves me correctly, can be found in the video of the original post of this thread.  The professor was more than likely not basing the number on the life of a patent, but basing it on the life of the technology itself.  The number is probably on the low side.

Gravock

Thank you for the informative reply.

Surely you are joking, Mr. Gravock! Using free energy to turn coal into combustible fuel??

A money number true in the 40s could easily be 10X or 20X higher now. But let's forget about putting fresh carbon into the atmosphere if we have free energy up our sleeve.


Best regards
CANGAS 157

[gravityblock]

Thank you for the informative reply.

Surely you are joking, Mr. Gravock! Using free energy to turn coal into combustible fuel??

A money number true in the 40s could easily be 10X or 20X higher now. But let's forget about putting fresh carbon into the atmosphere if we have free energy up our sleeve.


Best regards
CANGAS 157

How is a nuclear reactor going to fit into the cars, lawnmowers, airplanes, chainsaws, etc. for clean energy? 

Coal to liquid fuel (CTL) is cleaner, cheaper, and without the CTL carbon footprint.  ( http://www.technologyreview.com/news/426551/cleaner-cheaper-liquid-fuel-from-coal/ )

Synthetic trees capture carbon 1,000 times faster ( http://m.phys.org/news166374180.html )

Gravock