Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[sterlinga]

Aint that the truth.
In fact,none of the devices Sterling has presented as free energy device has ever paned out-->unless he has one in there with solar pannels some where

To prove that you're "full of it" on the pathological skeptic end of the spectrum, let me cite AN example that obliterates what you just said.

SHT has had three third-party tests by highly reputable organizations doing quantitative analysis showing ~500x, ~1300x, and ~900x output. Four third-party tests showing ~97% H output, from H2O input.

Also, Rossi has had considerable testing done, not to mention that his technology was purchased by Industrial Heat, as part of a 2 billion dollar fund, if I remember right, after 1 year due diligence.

You're like the Wright Brothers skeptics who for four years continued to say heavier-than-air flight would not be possible, despite the FACT that they were flying around doing demonstrations. Now that is obvious, then it wasn't. Guess where I would have been back then... Versus you...

[MileHigh]

I don't follow SHT so I can't comment.  If I recall MarkE said they are bogus.

That sounds like good news about Rossi with some qualifications.  If the tech is real, it's not free energy, it's atomic energy.  I know that you know that but so many people refer to it as free energy.  Rossi has a very shaky reputation so I can hope it's real.  Do you know when Industrial Heat is supposed to deploy the tech or put products on the market?

You are completely and utterly wrong on the Wright Brothers.  I read it all the time so this is push back.  Many scientists knew that flight was coming, but the people that controlled public opinion, the newspaper editors, where not scientifically literate and said it could not be done.  Do your proper research and you will never repeat that worn out and false cliche again.

[Pirate88179]

I sent the following email to Roberto just now (they're asleep presently):

Dansie said: "Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines. "   The safety lighting was on during the said time of the AuKW outage.   This is a pretty good point that needs a better explanation than what we've received so far.

/ END OF EMAIL

Sterling:

Good for you.  I am glad you sent this email because Mark Dansie is 100% correct in his assertions about emergency lighting.  I have never seen any variations of emergency lighting work other than in the way he described.

Bill

[LibreEnergia]

We now see comments like-wait until you try to do useful work with your stored energy -->What kind of an idiotic comment is that?. I think we can be quite confident that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 18psi over the two tank's is going to do more work that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 12psi over the two tanks-->when both temperatures are the same.

No one is disputing that you end up with more 'energy' inside the two tanks.  The point being made is that you will NEVER be able to do is end up back at the starting condition with the 40 psi tank refilled and  net external  work done.

The 'extra energy' you claim appears by 'drawing in from the ambient' is in fact coming from the work you must expend to raise the pressure in the 40 psi tank from atmospheric initially.  You don't even account for that energy in your analysis, so you can't claim 133% or 110% or whatever.. such numbers are meaningless drivel.

It's the same mistake that people make when analysing SMOT's and so forth by ignoring the energy their hand imparts to the system by bring the components to the starting configuration.

Rant all you like about 'senile old men who are still thinking in the dark ages' but until I see some analysis on your part that  is actually meaningful I'll continue to call you out.

[allcanadian]

@Mark E

The imagined possibility is exactly that:  Imagined.  The fantasy does not make the reality.  It sometimes inspires people to do the work
to make the reality, when such a thing is possible.
Your concept of science is at best poor and at worst completely wrong. 
Science seeks to learn what is real through employment of the scientific method:
A reason and evidence based methodology.

Science observes and studies natural phenomena while the inventor uses knowledge and understanding to create what others could not possibly imagine. The inventor makes fantasy reality and this has been proven throughout history. They invented the locomotive, the car, the airplane, the rocket and they will carry on inventing things in the future which others cannot possibly imagine and think is fantasy...that's the way it has been proven to work Mark. Your vote does not count and you don't actually have a say in the future because it is defined by whatever the inventors can dream up and make reality. I understand you have a great sense of self-importance but your nobody until such time as you become part of a solution to make things better in reality. Any fool can tell other people something cannot be done but some inventor somewhere always seems to show people different and this is the way it has always been.

The imagined possibility is exactly that:  Imagined.  The fantasy does not
make the reality.  It sometimes inspires people to do the work
to make the reality, when such a thing is possible.

To be honest I find you guys kind of comical because you pretend to be some kind of authority and yet you have absolutely none, you are nobody so far as the future is concerned. People will understand new things and they will invent new things we could not possibly imagine and that is a fact which has been proven throughout our history. Let's put it this way, where do you think we will be 1000 years from now?, I will give you a little hint... based on how far we have come in the last 100 years you and most everything you know will be completely irrelevant and you will be seen in the same light as we look at chimpanzees. Right now due to the exponential growth of knowledge a person enroled in a 4 year university technology program will graduate to find 90% of what they were taught during that time is now obsolete. Put's a whole new spin on things doesn't it?.

AC