Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[MileHigh]

Sterling:

So, those of you who jumped to the conclusion that this was absolute evidence of fraud, how do you feel now, being shown wrong on this point? Are you going to apologize?

What are you even saying here?  So the guy explained that the light was IR light done with IR LEDs?  So what, what does that prove?  What is  the point here?

I suppose that security cameras have their own IR lighting and visible emergency power lighting for people can be a totally separate thing.  So what?

I am missing something because even when it is supposedly running I don't see much in the clip that is convincing me that it is running.  Then when the power failure happens, besides the switchover to IR lighting, I still don't see much happening.  For me, I can't tell one way or the other before and after the power failure.  I just see a static image.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

MH
Your getting your buildings confused...

Not that it matters here  ,,but a slashed curtainwall is by no means a fatal blow.

Not even a flesh wound...A Joke actually ...

It was not just a curtain wall, it was one of the "tubes" that make up the building that was gashed from top nearly to bottom.

[sterlinga]

Also, regarding the "power outage" See my recent blog posting, which I'll copy here
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA%27s_AuKW_Demo#Power_Outage_Coincided_with_AuKW_Outage.3F

Here is Roberto's reply to my email:


  From: "Verein GAIA | Roberto Reuter" 
  To: "Sterling Allan" 
  Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 13:36 [GMT] 
  Subject: Re: safety lighting 

  Dear Sterling,   The so called "safety light" is the emitted light from the IR diodes of both cameras.   I attached a link to a pic from the cam - so its maybe more easy to understand..   (http://gaia-energy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/150430-aukw-besichtigung-halbzeit-2.jpg)   P.S: We use a TRENDNET TV-IP310PI   with best Regards from Roberto  Just now, he explained by Skype that their website is presently "offline - as we move our webspace to a more powerful server "

I suggested "You might also take a photo of that portion of the ceiling in relation to the demo to show there is no safety light situated there."

He said he would.
/END OF BLOG EXCERPT

So, those of you who jumped to the conclusion that this was absolute evidence of fraud, how do you feel now, being shown wrong on this point? Are you going to apologize?

Hmm.  Waiting for response from Roberto. I asked him:

"In this photo, could you tell me what the circled item is? It looks like a light that you installed, either as part of this demonstration in particular, for showcasing, or for emergency lighting compliance. It appears to be in the right location to provide what appears to be emergency light in the attached image. Maybe it had some kind of LED on it?"

[MarkE]

@MHHave you been drinking MH, the metals tensile strength does not magically change with size.
AC

I think he is talking about maximum load versus cantilever length. 

[MarkE]

I have already answered this question. Lets have a look at that NIST report-along with the FEMA report.
FEMA report states that the 767 was traveling at roughly 590MPH when it hit the tower
NIST report states that the 767 was traveling at around 546MPH when it hit the tower

First-what would you say the hight above sea level was where the planes impacted the two towers. Im guessing around 700 feet at best.
It is interesting to note that boeing states that the engines thrust for a 767 at 700 feet would max out at 330MHP,but the plane would begin to shake it self to peices at 220MPH at this altitude due to the density of the air. It's all there in plain !plane! english for you to read.

Jesus H ...  Well maybe if you have the flaps extended.  These silly ideas have been debated many times over the past 13 years.  A 767 does not come apart at 220MPH at sea level.  You've been drinking more of the conspiracy theorist mind altering Kool-Aid.  Go calculate Mach 0.86 at sea level.  It's a lot faster than 220MPH. 

Like i said before,yes i have read many reports,and like your beloved NIST report,they are just comical,and your very own physics proves them to be incorrect.

The people running around like the Mad Hatter are not the professionals at NIST who carefully investigated and then composed that report.

Please supply links and pictures of any other steel framed highrise building that has collapsed due to fire.

I just showed you a steel reinforced freeway intersection that failed due to heat from a petrol fire.  Show me how many 1000' or higher buildings have survived a 767 full of fuel crashing into them at 500mph.

It is a pack of-we dont know what the hell were talking about-->but they seem to be able to defy the laws of physics with there plane speeds.

No it is some really screwed up people bent on conspiracies who do not perform proper investigation who come up with lame ideas like a 767 coming apart at 220mph at sea level.  It is worse than wrong.

LMAS-are you serious Mark lol. And you say i have my head up my ass. I think you just ploted your own demise. If you cant see the difference between the two situations or circumstances,then maybe grade school would be more up your alley.

I see:  The conspiracy nut Kool-Aid gets you all giddy.

Unlike some,no-->but you seem to be lacking a bit in the area.



Or a specific building in a strange country. Not to forget the 330* spiral dive to line up this extreemly small land mark with the big barn doors.

Really?  You think that one of the largest office buildings ever built is a speck?  Take another swig of that Kool-Aid.

Just wondering if you could post a clear picture of the impact on the pentagon,and show us all where exactly the wings and engines impacted the building?,and how none of the street signs or structures were hit or damaged as they should have been if a 757 where on such a flight projectory.

Again really?  It's not like the video didn't get released:  http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/video-of-9-11-pentagon-attack/

.
Here is a little reserch for you Mark. Find me just one pilot that could execute that flight path with sucess,and then we will move on to the fact that a bloke that couldnt even get his cessna licence due to lack of skills could execute that same flight path with such accuracy

Well you put yourself into a logical pickle with that idea.  If you believe the FDR then the plane flew the path the FDR indicated and either overflew the Pentagon behind an invisible cloaking device to some secret hangar where the passenger and crew were murdered and the evidence destroyed or the plane hit the ground and the building.  Take your pick.

You truly are a small man Mark,and without heart. Due to his reserch and discoveries(the truth),he was forced out-shuned for doing such reserch.

He is one crazy person who insisted on pressing his unfounded ideas.  His colleagues who actually worked in specialties like structural engineering were some of the ones who complained the most.  Nutty is as nutty does.  You apparently partake that Kool-Aid which I find disappointing.  But, there you go.

It has nothing to do with his abilities as a physicist. He(unlike you) was able to open his eyes,and show courage in what he did. He is 10x's the man you will ever be,and i now know what sort of a person you really are. Your a closed book,and your HD is full-no room for new data with you. You are old school etched,and have no room for the truth or the new that go's against what you think is correct. Well i got some bad news for ya-->the walls are closing in,and soon there going to smack you right between the eye's. Your little world is going to come crashing down around you. This may knock some sense into you,but i have the feeling that you will just go off line. Like i said before,you belittle everyone you think is beneath you,but when one of the big guns takes you on,you never take up the challenge-you hide like the small man you are.

You're getting nuttier and nuttier.