All You Know is Wrong - That's Official ;-)

[DROBNJAK]

I posted a constricted version on EEVbog's forum, but here is a bit more liberal version. Enjoy. Scalar field is live and kicking, confirmed by Aharonov-Bohm's effect and Nobel Prize laureate. Long live Nikola Tesla, TPU, Woodward Effect, Dr. William J. Hooper, Dr. Deborah Chung, Caduceus Coils, Distinti et. all. Apologies to anybody I missed out.


There was a conference about Aharonov-Bohm's effect on university in Tel Aviv University. Professor Chen Ning Yang, who won Nobel Prize in Physics (1957), talks about controversial castration of Maxwell equations by Oliver Heaviside.

Since 99% of Electrical & Electronics Engineers live in the illusion that Maxwell's equations they are thought at university are 'complete' Maxwell's equations, this might be an eye opener. If not an eye-popper 

History of the Vector Potential

Just to disambiguate, this videos without shadow of doubt, demonstrates that Maxwell's equations that are tough at universities across whole world for more than 100 years are 'censored' or 'crippled' Maxwell's equations. And since Theory of Relativity is derived from 'crippled' Maxwell's equations, Relaitivy is just a special case, nothing more. Notably, Relativity doesn't apply to rotation and acceleration, only to movement in straight line at a constant speed.

And, since we all like experimental proof, and many people here have good instrumentation, somebody might try to verify this:

emf002x: Measuring the Rhombus Experiment
emf001x: Quad Loop: Experimental Data

Lab demonstration of Negative Resistance in plain wires, by professor Dr. Deborah Chung, Buffalo, NY:

  Negative Resistance in Conductors

Please don't jump on me until you watch the videos till the end.

Now, can somebody who is better at maths than myself, explain to me does this mean that Free Energy is possible? The above Scalar field is non-conservative, meaning one can take energy out of scalar field without putting it back in and one can put energy into scalar field without getting it back. Is my interpretation too optimistic?


And finally, this is Chen Ning Yang's equation that will most likely change the science as we know it and change the world:

[tinman]

Lol
MH will love this one.
Tear up them book's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fF1eyBxdt6c

[tinman]

I see the big guns are leaving this one alone
Easier to bury your head in the sand,than to find out what you thought was right is in fact wrong.

[Dave45]

MH will love this one.
Tear up them book's.

I see the big guns are leaving this one alone (http://overunity.com/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
Easier to bury your head in the sand,than to find out what you thought was right is in fact wrong. (http://overunity.com/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

Roflmao

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yf4ejzSYnYw/UTdplBJiiLI/AAAAAAAAAE0/lDExvjERfFw/s320/mmmmmmm+donut.+100+oc+animated+gif+i+made+for+my_4a2d7d_3944935.gif

[tinman]

Roflmao

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yf4ejzSYnYw/UTdplBJiiLI/AAAAAAAAAE0/lDExvjERfFw/s320/mmmmmmm+donut.+100+oc+animated+gif+i+made+for+my_4a2d7d_3944935.gif

Lol
Nice one Dave.
But i must admit that i too didnt see what was right in front of me all this time. This is a clasic example how easy we are led to believe one thing,when the truth is staring us right in the eye.

Doh. lol