Friedrich Luling Magnet Motor

[dieter]

So this dude has found a way to turn off the permanent magnet at the sticky point he says. Great. Does he also reveal hiw he does that?


If not, honestly, then this is just another guess n speculate thing. And these things never work.


Such a prefered myth consumption loop is really an interesting behaviour pattern. I wonder why people don't concentrate on open source concepts.

[guest1289]

The following magnet-motor from 2013 seems genuine( I received an email from someone who viewed it ), and the  magnetic-shielding concept seems familiar  to the 'Friedrich Luling motor' ,  :

http://blog.hasslberger.com/2013/11/german_inventor_solves_permane.html

You probably already saw the design I posted last year :

http://overunity.com/16528/my-magnet-motor-3-5-is-censored-on-all-the-internet-search-engines/

However,  according to some knowledgeable people,   most magnet-motors  are a waste of time because no magnets,  not even neodymium ones will last very long in a magnet-motor ,  especially if they are continually being repelled,  I have never built one,  so I don't know.

Although,  no repelling occurs in my 'Magnet-Motor-3.5' .

[dieter]

Ah, that "magnets being used up" is pretty much nonsense. It certainly does not nullify any violation of the first law, provided there is any such working all magnet motor.


About Engel, so basicly he's using a rotating Magnet on the stator. At least that was revealed before he died. This is driven by 7mA 9V dc motor, 63 mW.


However, I did in fact observe some strange imbalance between the forces of attraction and repulsen and that of momentum alignement. I still would not outrule this phenomen as a driving force.


Watching a PM closer made me notice two things: in a magnetic field, two forces are involved: the force of the polar attraction and the force of vectoral alignement. Two magnets, facing eachother, will only attract or repell, but two magnets, side by side, will experience both, torque and attraction and repulsion. Seemingly Torque is not just the result of attraction and repulsion.


So there may be a window of probability, contradicting accepted beliefs, but a lot of guesswork is involved.


Your thread linked above I will read now...

[dieter]

So your thread is basicly a rant about google. Yes, google does censor a lot, and being top ranking on google requires to use tricks. Their indexing engine became a bit stupid lately, serving tons of spam, eg. hundreds of instant urls, containing your search term, but all fake. Yet, searching for a pdf of a book, will list tons of fake book sites and after hours of download attempts, must give up (now having revealed their email addresses to all those sites, which require an account etc.)


Google could even serve customized search results, since every google account user (also youtube or samsung/android) has his personality file at google, for personalized google Ads and what not.


Theoreticly a AI program could use this to do evil things, such as isolating certain people, or drive them into suicide.


So better don't use google at all, also no device in which google has hardcoded access, such als Galaxy etc.


Searching for a certain book on search.yandex.ru then brougjt me in seconds to bookzz.org, that is censored by google.


About your motor. Basicly a ramp motor, as far as I understand. Thousends had the same idea. Does not work, as azzraction and repulsion are in equilibrium, regardless of the angle. What comes out must have come in.


That is all part of the learning curve and the one of accepted science ends shortly after the basics in magnetism (the dogmata minefield no established labcoat dares to cross), so stay optimistic, progressive knowledge is just behind the next corner.

[guest1289]

 NOTE :  I UPDATED THIS POST TO CLARIFY SOME THINGS

that link to my  "magnet-motor-3.5" was just so you'd see the motor

  my  "magnet-motor-3.5" is especially designed to make the only  'potential'   sticky-point on the  individual  'propulsion-components',  work against the same  sticky-point  on the other  'identical'  individual  'propulsion-components',  repeating that effect as many times as required to  effectively-neutralize  all these  potential  identical  sticky-points.
        -  that then allows the propulsion-effect  to be unaffected by any  'potential' sticky-points
        - a perfectly optimized design in terms of ratios/proportions of components/magnetic-strengths  could even possibly eliminate the need for multiple  propulsion-components

     My other magnet-motor  designs I have posted on this site since 2015,  'may' '?'  not have as much potential as this motor,  however,  they may be even more interesting
_______________

   If you wanted to defeat the law of  thermodynamics-?/conservation-of-energy-?( I can't remember which laws they are )  you do not even need to build a magnet-motor,  there is something much simpler,  and just as impressive

   All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation defeats  the law of thermodynamics-?/conservation-of-energy-?,  by directly disproving   earnshaw's-theorem,  and,  the law of  magnetic-levitation,  in other words achieving the same as  Electromagnetic-Levitation  but only by  using  Permanent-Magnets,  nothing else,  and no cheating by using  diamagnetics
      -  explained 3 paragraphs down

   at least two members on this site have said they built devices achieving  All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation,  and one device was even a functioning  magnetic-bearing

  ( full-levitation means that the levitating-magnet/magnets absolutely do no touch anything else at all  )

  earnshaw's-theorem says that All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation  can not be achieved,  because,  if it is achieved,  then the levitating-magnet/magnets  would be  constantly  vibrating/moving,   and this would therefore be  perpetual-motion/free-energy

    Relating to the above paragraph,  one of the two members on this site who said that they built devices achieving  All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation,  said that they did in fact observe this constant  vibration(  perpetual-motion/free-energy  )

   I posted numerous All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation  designs since  2015,  some were  rotatable-bearings,  while others were just  couplings,  these designs were designed to work at any angle in relation to gravity,
      My designs would function like as a 3d-version of the  following  very-impressive  invention below( the invention below is not my invention ),  called  the  "inverter magnet"
      -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU 
            I didn't know about that invention,  when I started posting my designs,  but afterwards I thought of that invention as a type of proof of the validity of my designs
            (  Note : There are inventions  pre-dating the above invention ( the "inverter magnet" ),  which achieve the same effect  )

      However,  as I mentioned before,  people have/must already have designed and successfully built these things( 'full'-levitation-versions,  long before me  )

      Note : I have not successfully built any of these things, I don't have appropriate magnets etc

      Note : this is actually mentioned on the wikipedia-pages for  earnshaws-theorem,  and for  magnetic-levitation
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnshaw's_theorem

Earnshaw's theorem has no exceptions for non-moving permanent ferromagnets. However, Earnshaw's theorem does not necessarily apply to moving ferromagnets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_levitation
           In the page above for magnetic-levitation,  it is even more ambiguously mentioned,  so much so that at the moment I can no longer pinpoint it, they may have changed it, but basically this page just refers to Earnshaw's-theorem anyway
     
      obviously you'll find no pictures of this,  on wikipedia,  and people like the 2 members on this site will not post anything either,  as you probably see why

      so today, these homebuilt devices must be very common in households interested in them

      Note :  This also applies to   'Electrostatics'

      Levitating-Toy-Train 
         So, using my designs,  and/or the invention in the video,  you should be able to build a toy All-Permanent-Magnet-'Full'-Levitation  Train,  using flexible magnetic-strips( having N-S polarity ) as tracks,  so basically,  you would have  3-rails
             -  two outer-rails to repel the train upwards
             -  and one-inner-rail  to anchor/attract( 'no'-contact, just like the  "inverter magnet" )  the train to the track
        (  However,  the inventions that  Pre-Date  the  "inverter magnet"  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU  ,  could mean that this train could be achieved just by using  just  2-rails  )
            As you can see,  this train would never be allowed in toy shops.

       (  these are the only of any of my designs that I tried building, but I don't have the right magnets  )

       Apparently, according to one of the members on this site, the very simplest way to achieve this  is just by using a  magnetic-cylinder,  to repel something inside?/above it?
       
       But this was actually also a miscellaneous design I included in a PDF I posted on this-? site and on other places,  my design was simply a  ring-magnet,  and then you have the  floating-magnet  floating just above it( in it's center ),  and keeping it in place using the methods below
        in the design I posted in places( I can't remember precisely where ),
        -  below the  ring-magnet,  I included  a  magnetic-anchor( 'no'-contact, just like the  "inverter magnet" ),  to keep the  floating-magnet( a long component maybe containing 2 magnets )  right in the center( and slightly above) of the  ring-magnet
        -  but a much easier way would be to have a  weight( non metallic, or non magnetizable )  hanging down from the  floating-magnet  to keep it floating  right in the center( and slightly above) of the  ring-magnet,  a  gravity-magnetic-floater