TinMan Generator Research Moderated Topic

[a.king21]

I think we should all examine this patent carefully. It also talks about the amplidyne.
The patent is Robert Alexander's.


http://www.rexresearch.com/alxandr/3913004.pdf


It's very close to Tinman's research.

[poynt99]

As in this drawing by verpies?

[allcanadian]

Hey Erfinder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uAYKhrPDPc[/font][/size]Now what this has to do with the Rotary Transformer as its being presented I can only speculate at, and I would rather not fill pages with my speculation when the source is here.  At any rate, the patent that Aking recommends, if you flip back a few pages you will see that I recommended it before Aking and Allcanadian...in light of the lack of clarity, it is by far the best bet that we have.....for the moment....

That is a very interesting video, a motor which does not load electrically when loaded mechanically. I used to think this was not possible however I have come to believe it is normal, it is just dependent on what our sense of normal is. As well I have come to understand you and I have a very different view of resonance than most anyone else I have ever met. The proverbial series resonance simply does not register in the minds of many others as we see it and I think I know what you are implying as I have seen it at the bench.


I think of it this way, if the properties which load a motor electrically can be shunted and sent down circuit, make a loop and return right back to their place of origin from the opposite direction then we have fundamentally changed the properties of the motor. That which has inhibited growth is now an integral part of that which encourages it.


I think Grumage made an awesome effort showing resonance however when I saw the video I thought to myself... that is not the resonance I was speaking of. My resonance forces a circuit element to store an amount of energy equal to that dissipated in the load..equal yet opposite. On the next cycle this stored energy adds to that from the source at resonance establishing a new operating theshold. It is simply a variation of Kirchhoff's Law which still sums to zero however where it sum's to zero has changed. The zero point of dissipation vs accumulation is moving through the system rather than being considered a static point. The law applies however in a completely different context and I have found context really does matter. The context defines what it is and how it must act in any given instance versus another.


Interesting stuff... I always like reading your posts.




AC

[a.king21]

Yes, you should!  Don't waste any time waiting....begin looking into that patent now!  It mentions 3x out over in.....and does such several times!  One of the first patented examples of OU.

Yes, the credit belongs to Erfinder; So I'll repost the link:  http://www.rexresearch.com/alxandr/3913004.pdf
My alert was with the scope shot sketch. In my understanding that is what an OU scope shot looks like.


I'm also intrigued by the mention of the amplidyne. There is even a short thread on this site:
http://overunity.com/12738/amplidyne-a-mechanical-amplifier/#.VbPaQ5AfjKc

[poynt99]

How to loop test an apparent COP>1 device...