'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours

[allcanadian]

@Gravityblock

The postulates of modern physics and theories based on
them do  not allow for absolute notions: energy, speed, time, frame of
reference. The  postulates of rhythmodynamics and wave geometry, on the
contrary, suggest  impossibility of creating a clear physical picture of the
world without the carrier of constructs in geometry and wave medium in
rhythmodynamics. The  advantage of rhythmodynamics' approach is in its ability
to use both absolute  and relative notions. For example, the objects' speed in
wave medium is  absolute, the speed between the objects is relative.

I like this quote from the link you posted. I have found this to be true and there is little progress to be made in examining local superficial events if one is unable to see the big picture. It should come as no surprise that the true nature of the Primary Fields and Inertia are completely unknown to science. My premise is simple... if it don't work then don't do it thus I reject the popular understanding of how things are supposed to work.

Concerning the boat and rocks experiment, I think it's important to see the contradiction in terms. In science they try to make absolute statements such as if I throw the two rocks in opposite directions there in no net motion in either direction. The contradiction here is that it is implied that there can never be any net motion under any circumstances however this is obviously not true. As such it is seldom if ever a matter of facts but moreso the context in which they apply or do not apply. In effect people tend to distort the facts to suit their own beliefs ultimately leading to the religion of modern science. It is no wonder 47% of scientists have falsified data or know someone who has in order to substantiate their beliefs. In essense it's a quagmire and is seldom if ever as it seems on the surface.

The fact is we may have one truth in one context which is completely false in another as we see with the boat and rocks experiment. So we must ask what is the truth when the truth is variable dependent on the context in which it applies. As such my tool for success is not a textbook but thought experiments to determine my own truth for myself.
It's a whacky world.


AC

[MarkE]

MarkE doesn't have time to post a scientific or mathematical rebuttal, but he has the time to make meaningless posts and to spam this thread, such as his latest reply. LOL

It is you who is producing the baffle gab without a scientific or mathematical rebuttal.  Another psychological projection.


@minnie, thanks for your wonderful contribution in helping marke spam this thread

Gravock

LOL

[minnie]

   Gravityblock it's like a children's pantomime when you're involved.
   Oh yes it is, oh  no it isn't!
   At least in the end I managed to see why pi was 4.
     John.

[allcanadian]

"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice
"You must be", said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here"
Alices Adentures in OUland

AC

[Pirate88179]

"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice
"You must be", said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here"
Alices Adentures in OUland

AC

I thought it was the hatter that was mad?  I'll have to read that book again.

Bill