Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours

Started by Pirate88179, July 29, 2015, 01:12:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 ... 60
User actions

gravityblock

#135
August 10, 2015, 12:08:10 AM
Here's a video demonstration showing how to lift an object really high with very little input energy.  And it uses the atmospheric pressure and a vacuum to do so.  Oh, and a perfect vacuum isn't necessary.  How does this not qualify as a reaction-less drive?

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

MarkE

#136
August 10, 2015, 12:29:11 AM
Quote from: gravityblock on August 09, 2015, 09:27:27 PM
Anyone with half a brain can see that MarkE didn't do the calculations according to the process described in the hypothetical.  Yeah, thank MarkE for giving us a false visualization of the hypothetical process.  What a way to be, lol.  I did say MarkE was going to draw the wrong visualization before he even posted any calculations.  How did I know that?  Because it's easy enough to work out the finer details in your head without even resorting to any kind of math.

Gravock
LOL, then show your work.

gravityblock

#137
August 10, 2015, 12:35:56 AM
Quote from: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 12:29:11 AM
LOL, then show your work.

LOL, you did my work for me.  You showed in your calculations how you conventionally ignored the process described in the hypothetical.  In addition to this, your own words on several occasions also showed how you ignored the process described.

Gravock 
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

MarkE

#138
August 10, 2015, 01:03:12 AM
Quote from: gravityblock on August 10, 2015, 12:08:10 AM
Here's a video demonstration showing how to lift an object really high with very little input energy.  And it uses the atmospheric pressure and a vacuum to do so.  Oh, and a perfect vacuum isn't necessary.  How does this not qualify as a reaction-less drive?

Gravock
Yes, given the chance water does fall down around lighter objects.

MarkE

#139
August 10, 2015, 01:06:27 AM
Quote from: gravityblock on August 10, 2015, 12:35:56 AM
LOL, you did my work for me.  You showed in your calculations how you conventionally ignored the process described in the hypothetical.  In addition to this, your own words on several occasions also showed how you ignored the process described.

Gravock
LOL, You can choose to show your work or not.  So far it is not.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 ... 60
User actions