Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours

Started by Pirate88179, July 29, 2015, 01:12:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 ... 60
User actions

Pirate88179

#180
August 10, 2015, 10:15:24 PM
Quote from: gravityblock on August 10, 2015, 09:33:50 PM
Right or wrong, I'm not looking to receive anything.  There has been a lot of famous scientists in the past who were called crack pots in their time, and they were proven to be correct many years later.  The reverse has occurred also.

Gravock

My vote is with the reverse on this one.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

gravityblock

#181
August 10, 2015, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: Pirate88179 on August 10, 2015, 10:15:24 PM
My vote is with the reverse on this one.

Bill

That vote makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  So, you think I'm right at this particular time, but will be proven wrong and a crack pot down the road.  Or, you think MarkE is right at this particular time, but will be proven wrong and a crack pot down the road.  Either way, your own thoughts and reasoning skills are conflicted against each other.    This is almost as good as, "you have to speed up to slow down, and slow down to speed up".

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

MarkE

#182
August 10, 2015, 10:53:19 PM
Quote from: Pirate88179 on August 10, 2015, 10:15:24 PM
My vote is with the reverse on this one.

Bill
GravityBlock is not a famous scientist.  He does seem revel in promoting a relatively famous crackpot: MM.

gravityblock

#183
August 10, 2015, 11:21:58 PM
Quote from: MarkE on August 10, 2015, 10:53:19 PM
GravityBlock is not a famous scientist.  He does seem revel in promoting a relatively famous crackpot: MM.

It's not a requirement to be a famous scientist in order to be considered right or wrong, and later proven to be otherwise.  I'm not promoting MM here.  If you think I am, then kindly show me the references of MM that relates to the same ideas I'm promoting on this topic.  In case you haven't noticed, I've been promoting the ideas as presented by RD (you missed the boat again).  You have done nothing but misrepresent what I have posted.  And, you do this with others who don't agree with you.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

MarkE

#184
August 10, 2015, 11:35:26 PM
LOL, it is up to you to properly represent your ideas.  If you are unhappy with the way that you think that I or anyone else represents them then it is up to you to set the record straight as to what your ideas are.  You do yourself no favors with your stated contempt for established physics.  So far you have done nothing to establish that your ideas better represent reality than established physics.  If your hope is to convince folks that your ideas are anything other than so much crackpottery, I think you are doing a particularly poor job.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 ... 60
User actions